ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2026
Do Chemically Modified Oligonucleotide Therapeutics Require Environmental Risk Assessment?
Article in Environmental science & technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Synthetic modified oligonucleotides (mONs) are a rapidly evolving class of nucleic acid-based therapeutics with an expected increase in market approval rates. mONs are designed to resist enzymatic degradation in patients, and their biological effects arise from chemical modifications and sequence-dependent phenomena comparable to those of biologically active genetic materials. These properties and the absence of experimental evidence on the occurrence and impact of mONs emitted into aquatic environments raise questions about the need for environmental risk assessment (ERA). Here, we evaluate (i) the chemical modifications proposed for mONs and found in approved therapeutics, (ii) pharmacological data on excretion to inform emission scenarios, (iii) analytical approaches for quantification of mONs in environmental matrices, (iv) anticipated distribution and transformation processes, and (v) potential (eco)toxicological effect profiles of mONs. We propose that focusing on chemical modifications allows for a more generalized approach to assessing mON exposure in engineered and natural aquatic systems. By contrast, the evaluation of effects requires case-by-case studies of chemical modifications and nucleotide sequences in the mON products. We suggest to address the need for ERAs by monitoring mONs in wastewater with newly developed analytical methods as well as experimental studies in laboratory model systems of processes that determine mON exposure and effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.