ArticleBreast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)2026
Hormonal contraceptives and cancer risk in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic variant.
Article in Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWomen with BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants face increased risks of breast and ovarian cancers. Our study aimed to evaluate the impact of hormonal contraceptive use on these risks.
methodsThis matched cohort study included 1677 women who were found to carry a BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate hazard ratios associated with oral contraceptive use and with levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device use.
resultsAmong BRCA1 carriers (n = 990), oral contraceptive use was not associated with breast cancer risk (HR = 0.90, 95% CI 0.77-1.05, p = 0.2). Among BRCA2 carriers (n = 687), oral contraceptive use was associated with reduced breast cancer risk (HR = 0.80, 95% CI 0.65-0.99, p = 0.04), although duration-stratified analyses did not demonstrate a consistent dose-response relationship. Oral contraceptive use was associated with a decrease in the risk of ovarian cancer in BRCA2 carriers (HR = 0.57, 95% CI 0.35-0.94, p = 0.028), with the strongest protective effect observed among BRCA2 carriers who used an oral contraceptive for more than 5 years (HR = 0.13; 95% CI 0.02-0.92). The protective effect of oral contraceptive use was less profound for BRCA1 carriers. The use of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device was not associated with breast or ovarian cancer risk.
conclusionThe use of an oral contraceptive was associated with reduced risks of breast and ovarian cancer among BRCA2 carriers, although the observed association with breast cancer should be interpreted cautiously given the absence of a consistent duration-response pattern. There was no increase in the risk of breast cancer among BRCA1 carriers who used an oral contraceptive. No association with either cancer was found among users of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42611417What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.