Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42611416›Full record

ArticleNetherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation2026

Invasive and echocardiographic gradients of self- and balloon-expandable valves in failing aortic bioprostheses.

Sraman Chatterjee, Mark van den Dorpel, Rik Adrichem, Claire Ben Ren, Isabella Kardys, Rutger-Jan Nuis, Joost Daemen, Alexander Hirsch, Marcel L Geleijnse, Nicolas M Van Mieghem

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Study designs and outcomes.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sraman ChatterjeeDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Mark van den DorpelDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Rik AdrichemDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Claire Ben RenDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Isabella KardysDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Rutger-Jan NuisDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Joost DaemenDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Alexander HirschDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Marcel L GeleijnseDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Nicolas M Van MieghemDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. n.vanmieghem@erasmusmc.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTranscatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an established treatment for a failing aortic bioprosthesis. The hemodynamics of TAVI in degenerated transcatheter or surgical aortic valves (TAV-in-TAV or TAV-in-SAV) are unknown. We aimed to investigate hemodynamic differences between self- and balloon-expandable TAV-in-TAV and TAV-in-SAV groups, and transthoracic echocardiography-derived (TTE) versus invasive transaortic pressure gradients.

methodsPatients ≥ 18 years with a self-expanding EVOLUT (SEV) or balloon-expandable SAPIEN3 (BEV) valve for TAV-in-TAV or TAV-in-SAV were included. Transaortic gradients were determined invasively and by TTE within 48 h post-intervention.

resultsWe identified 56 patients with SEV (n = 36) or BEV (n = 20) TAV in a failing aortic bioprosthesis. Fourteen cases involved failing transcatheter valves and 42 surgical bioprostheses. Invasive mean gradients were similar after BEV and SEV (median (25th-75th percentile): 6.0 (1.5-6.5) vs 7.0 (2.0-10.0) mm Hg, p = 0.109). Mean gradients by TTE were higher for BEV than SEV at discharge (16.0 (10.8-19.8) versus 10.0 (7.0-12.0) mm Hg, p = 0.003) and 12-month follow-up (13.0 (11.0-15.5) versus 9.0 (7.0-12.3) mm Hg, p = 0.025). The discrepancy between TTE and invasive mean gradients was significantly larger for BEV than SEV (13.0 (6.3-14.0) vs 3.0 (1.5-8.3) mm Hg, p = 0.001) and most pronounced in TAV-in-SAV (BEV 13.0 (6.3-17.0) vs SEV 3.0 (1.0-8.5) mm Hg, p = 0.004).

conclusionMean gradient after TAV in a failing bioprosthesis is similar for BEV and SEV, when measured invasively, but higher with BEV than SEV by TTE. The discordance between invasive and TTE-derived mean gradients is the largest in BEV.

Indexed as

EchocardiographyHemodynamicsTAVI

Identifiers

PMID42611416
PMCPMC13504006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.