ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2026
Deep learning-derived left ventricular circumferential strain for cardiac MRI diagnosis of acute myocarditis with preserved ejection fraction.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To evaluate the diagnostic performance of deep learning-derived left ventricular circumferential strain (DL-LVCS), a method that reduces operator dependency and analysis time compared with conventional feature tracking, in patients with acute myocarditis and preserved LVEF (≥ 55%), and to compare it with feature tracking-derived strain (FT-LVCS). This retrospective study, conducted between January 2021 and December 2024, included 142 patients with acute myocarditis, stratified into preserved EF (AMY-pEF, n = 106, mean age, 31 ± 9 years; 80 male) and reduced EF (n = 36, mean age, 33 ± 12 years; 27 male) groups, alongside 106 age- and sex-matched healthy controls (mean age, 32 ± 7 years; 78 male). A deep learning model integrating PPIM-Net (Pyramid Progressive Image Mapping Network) for segmentation and U-Net for motion tracking was developed to compute DL-LVCS. Conventional LVCS was also obtained. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using ROC analysis, and AUCs were compared with the DeLong test. In the AMY-pEF group, both FT-LVCS (-18.4%±1.2 vs. -19.8% ±1.3) and DL-LVCS (-8.0%±1.4 vs. -10.4%±1.8) were significantly impaired versus controls (both P < 0.001). For diagnosing AMY-pEF, FT-LVCS (cutoff=-19.3%) achieved an AUC of 0.806, with 67.2% sensitivity and 84.5% specificity. DL-LVCS (cutoff=-9.2%) demonstrated significantly higher AUC (0.887), sensitivity (85.9%), and specificity (79.2%) (DeLong P < 0.01). DL-LVCS enables quantification of myocardial deformation and demonstrates higher sensitivity than conventional LVCS for discriminating patients with CMR-defined acute myocarditis and preserved LVEF from healthy controls. It may serve as a supplementary CMR biomarker when standard functional metrics are within normal ranges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42611414What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.