Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42611414›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2026

Deep learning-derived left ventricular circumferential strain for cardiac MRI diagnosis of acute myocarditis with preserved ejection fraction.

Xinping Zhang, Ce Wang, Caixue Cheng, Zhuo Xiang, Yuantao Huang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xinping ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Southern University of Science and Technology Hospital, Guangdong, China.
Ce WangDepartment of Radiology, Southern University of Science and Technology Hospital, Guangdong, China.
Caixue ChengDepartment of Radiology, Southern University of Science and Technology Hospital, Guangdong, China.
Zhuo XiangMarshall Laboratory of Biomedical Engineering, Guangdong Key Laboratory for Biomedical Measurements and Ultrasound Imaging, School of Biomedical Engineering, National-Regional Key Technology Engineering Laboratory for Medical Ultrasound, Shenzhen University Medical School, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518060, Guangdong, China.
Yuantao HuangDepartment of Radiology, Southern University of Science and Technology Hospital, Guangdong, China. 756748840@qq.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-8945-2157

Funding

Sanming Project of Medicine in Shenzhen Nanshan District No. SZSM202103001The Health Technology Project of Nanshan District, Shenzhen NS2025024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of deep learning-derived left ventricular circumferential strain (DL-LVCS), a method that reduces operator dependency and analysis time compared with conventional feature tracking, in patients with acute myocarditis and preserved LVEF (≥ 55%), and to compare it with feature tracking-derived strain (FT-LVCS). This retrospective study, conducted between January 2021 and December 2024, included 142 patients with acute myocarditis, stratified into preserved EF (AMY-pEF, n = 106, mean age, 31 ± 9 years; 80 male) and reduced EF (n = 36, mean age, 33 ± 12 years; 27 male) groups, alongside 106 age- and sex-matched healthy controls (mean age, 32 ± 7 years; 78 male). A deep learning model integrating PPIM-Net (Pyramid Progressive Image Mapping Network) for segmentation and U-Net for motion tracking was developed to compute DL-LVCS. Conventional LVCS was also obtained. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using ROC analysis, and AUCs were compared with the DeLong test. In the AMY-pEF group, both FT-LVCS (-18.4%±1.2 vs. -19.8% ±1.3) and DL-LVCS (-8.0%±1.4 vs. -10.4%±1.8) were significantly impaired versus controls (both P < 0.001). For diagnosing AMY-pEF, FT-LVCS (cutoff=-19.3%) achieved an AUC of 0.806, with 67.2% sensitivity and 84.5% specificity. DL-LVCS (cutoff=-9.2%) demonstrated significantly higher AUC (0.887), sensitivity (85.9%), and specificity (79.2%) (DeLong P < 0.01). DL-LVCS enables quantification of myocardial deformation and demonstrates higher sensitivity than conventional LVCS for discriminating patients with CMR-defined acute myocarditis and preserved LVEF from healthy controls. It may serve as a supplementary CMR biomarker when standard functional metrics are within normal ranges.

Indexed as

Deep learningMagnetic resonance imagingMyocardial strainMyocarditisPreserved ejection fraction

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.