Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42611383›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgical review2026

The clinical trials landscape of hydrocephalus: a scoping review of therapeutic priorities, innovation trends, and research gaps.

Sima Vazquez, Sai Sanikommu, Victor M Lu, Robert T Buckley

Abstract readScoping Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sima VazquezDepartment of Neurosurgery, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Louis Pope, 2nd Floor, Miami, FL, 33136, USA. sxv144@miami.edu.
Sai SanikommuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Louis Pope, 2nd Floor, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.
Victor M LuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Louis Pope, 2nd Floor, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.
Robert T BuckleyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Louis Pope, 2nd Floor, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hydrocephalus includes a diverse group of disorders with different causes, symptoms, and treatment options. Despite progress in surgery and diagnostics, the overall understanding of clinical research in hydrocephalus remains limited. We performed a scoping review to systematically examine registered clinical trials, aiming to identify trends in treatment approaches, research areas, and gaps in the current evidence. A comprehensive search of ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted to identify all registered clinical trials related to hydrocephalus. Trials were included regardless of study design, phase, or geographic location. Extracted variables included study characteristics, hydrocephalus subtype, intervention type, research domain, recruitment status, and geographic distribution. Trials were categorized into interventional, device-focused, and biomarker/imaging domains, and analyzed descriptively to assess temporal trends, global distribution, and research priorities. A total of 90 trial entries were identified. The majority of studies focused on adult populations (84.4%), with normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) representing the predominant subtype (71.1%). Interventional trials accounted for 60.0% of studies, followed by biomarker and imaging investigations (25.6%) and device-focused trials (14.4%). Surgical and procedural interventions were most common (43.3%), while pharmacologic therapies were limited (7.8%). Clinical trial activity has increased substantially over time, with nearly half of all trials (47.8%) registered between 2020 and 2026. Geographic distribution was heavily concentrated in high-income regions, particularly Europe (46.5%) and North America (32.3%), with limited representation from other regions. Most studies were conducted within a single country (91.1%), with minimal international collaboration. At the time of analysis, 30% of trials were reported as completed status, while 31.1% remained active. The overall trial completion status was 67.5%. The landscape of hydrocephalus clinical trials is rapidly growing but still uneven, mainly focusing on NPH studies and device- and procedure-based treatments, with little development in non-surgical therapies, reflecting the predominantly structural nature of hydrocephalus. Research efforts are mostly in high-income areas with limited global collaboration. These results reveal important gaps in treatment development, trial design, and geographic diversity, emphasizing the need for a more balanced and worldwide research approach to improve hydrocephalus management.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicHydrocephalusEvidence GapsHumansCerebrospinal fluid disordersClinical trialsDevice-based therapyGlobal healthHydrocephalusNeurosurgeryNormal pressure hydrocephalusScoping reviewTrial design

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.