ArticleThe Journal of membrane biology2026
Is the Bilayer Insertion of the Peptide KALP23 Under Kinetic or Thermodynamic Control?
Article in The Journal of membrane biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Replacing a protein's sidechain can alter its interaction with a membrane, conferring a thermodynamic benefit or penalty. These thermodynamic consequences of mutations can be estimated using hydrophobicity scales, yet are challenging to validate experimentally. Here, we examine the structural and thermodynamic consequences of membrane interactions using two model peptides KALP23 and WALP23. In these peptides, respectively, two lysine residues or two tryptophan residues are placed at each end of a transmembrane helix. Application of several hydrophobicity scales suggests that the free energy of insertion of KALP23 is 10-15 kcal/mol less favorable than that of WALP23. According to these predictions, the lowest free energy for KALP would be in solution and not in the membrane, and KALP would be kinetically "trapped" in the transmembrane conformation during standard sample preparation based on co-solubilization with lipids in organic solvents. In order to quantitatively test this prediction, we utilized a different approach of sample preparation which utilizes fluorinated surfactants capable of maintain hydrophobic peptides in solution without interacting with the bilayer themselves. We demonstrated that both peptides can be inserted into the preformed vesicles, and that the free energy difference between their partitioning is < 1 kcal/mol. These results disprove the hypothesis that KALP peptides are kinetically trapped and open the doors for using this system for thermodynamic measurements to further test the additivity assumptions implicit in applications of hydrophobicity scales.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42611331What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.