Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42611237›Full record

ArticleACS nano2026

Measurement Error Models Enable Accurate Correlation of Nanoscale Properties and Structures.

Adam L Pintar, Andrew C Madison, Craig R Copeland, Natalia Farkas, Samuel M Stavis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS nano, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Adam L PintarStatistical Engineering Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland20899, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5021-2576
Andrew C MadisonMicrosystems and Nanotechnology Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland20899, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9456-2754
Craig R CopelandMicrosystems and Nanotechnology Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland20899, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3340-0006
Natalia FarkasMicrosystems and Nanotechnology Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland20899, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7102-7345
Samuel M StavisMicrosystems and Nanotechnology Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland20899, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7108-1405

Funding

CHIPS Metrology Program, part of CHIPS for America, National Institute of Standards and Technology, United States Department of Commerce NANational Institute of Standards and Technology Circular Economy Program NAUnited States Food and Drug Administration Office of Generic Drugs NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measurement errors can catastrophically bias parameter estimates in models to correlate nanoscale properties and structures, undercutting a foundation of nanoscience and nanotechnology. In a general solution to this latent problem, we derive a method-of-moments correction for least-squares estimates of correlative model parameters. Our correction applies to many relations of dependent and independent variables, subject to many types of measurement errors of the independent variable. Focusing on the prevalent power-law model to correlate optical intensity and nanoparticle size, we test the limits of accuracy of our correction and study the use of either reference size distributions or sizing uncertainty estimates to inform a measurement error model. We critically evaluate representative measurements of various nanoparticles, impacting the conclusions of several studies and changing expectations of intensity scaling exponents for nanoscale optical inferences. Our correction is immediately available, highly interpretable, and broadly applicable to gain reliable insights and prevent future mistakes.

Indexed as

fluorescencemicroscopyscatteringstatisticalstructure−propertyvariance

Identifiers

PMID42611237
PMCPMC13492464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.