ArticleNeuroradiology2026
Women in interventional neuroradiology: a survey from the European society of neuroradiology (ESNR).
Article in Neuroradiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeInterventional neuroradiology remains a male-dominated specialty despite increasing gender parity in medicine. This study aimed to evaluate the professional experiences, workplace environment, and perceived barriers faced by women in interventional neuroradiology across Europe. The primary research question was whether gender disparities persist within the European context and how these findings compare with previously published data from the Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) in North America.
methodsThe European Society of Neuroradiology (ESNR) conducted a 44-item anonymous online survey between December 2024 and January 2025, adapted from the SIR questionnaire. The survey explored demographics, training experiences, mentorship, discrimination, leadership opportunities, parental leave, and burnout. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed on responses from 77 female participants, and findings were compared with the 2018 SIR survey.
resultsMore than half of respondents (56%) reported being discouraged from pursuing interventional neuroradiology. Harassment (36% during training; 32% in practice) and discrimination (46% during training; 49% in practice) were frequently reported, while formal reporting rates remained low (13%). Leadership gaps persisted, with 54% holding no leadership role despite over half expressing interest. Burnout was highly prevalent (81%). Comparative analysis demonstrated similar or greater disparities in Europe compared with North American data from the 2018 survey.
conclusionsGender inequities in European interventional radiology remain substantial and mirror international trends. Structural reforms addressing mentorship, leadership access, workplace culture, salary transparency, and work-life integration are urgently needed to promote equity and professional sustainability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42611184What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.