Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42611177›Full record

SynthesisPharmaceutical medicine2026

Placebo Response in Randomised Controlled Trials of Systemic Therapies for Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Stéphanie Légaré, Sherry Lin, Sarah Vahey, Juan Gabriel Ovalles-Bonilla, Pina D'Angelo, Jasmina Jankicevic, Robert Bissonnette

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Pharmaceutical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Stéphanie LégaréIndero (formerly Innovaderm Research), 3530 St-Laurent Blvd, Suite 300, Montreal, Quebec, H2X 2V1, Canada.
Sherry LinIndero (formerly Innovaderm Research), 3530 St-Laurent Blvd, Suite 300, Montreal, Quebec, H2X 2V1, Canada.
Sarah VaheyIndero (formerly Innovaderm Research), 3530 St-Laurent Blvd, Suite 300, Montreal, Quebec, H2X 2V1, Canada.
Juan Gabriel Ovalles-BonillaIndero (formerly Innovaderm Research), 3530 St-Laurent Blvd, Suite 300, Montreal, Quebec, H2X 2V1, Canada. jovalles@inderocro.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6300-5341
Pina D'AngeloIndero (formerly Innovaderm Research), 3530 St-Laurent Blvd, Suite 300, Montreal, Quebec, H2X 2V1, Canada.
Jasmina JankicevicIndero (formerly Innovaderm Research), 3530 St-Laurent Blvd, Suite 300, Montreal, Quebec, H2X 2V1, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9973-1203
Robert BissonnetteIndero (formerly Innovaderm Research), 3530 St-Laurent Blvd, Suite 300, Montreal, Quebec, H2X 2V1, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5927-6587

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLupus erythematosus is a heterogeneous autoimmune disease with manifestations ranging from skin-limited forms to severe systemic disease. Despite the high prevalence of skin symptoms among lupus participants, no therapies are currently approved specifically for cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE). An increasing number of clinical trials have evaluated systemic therapies in lupus participants with cutaneous manifestations; however, placebo response in CLE has never been systematically examined. Characterising the magnitude and predictors of placebo response is essential to optimising trial design and improving the interpretability of efficacy outcomes in this population with significant unmet medical needs.

objectiveTo characterise placebo response in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of systemic therapies for CLE and explore clinical and design factors associated with increased placebo responses.

methodsA systematic literature review and meta-analysis were conducted on double-blind, randomised, placebo‑controlled trials published between 2005 and June 2024 that evaluated systemic therapies in CLE and reported outcomes using the Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI‑A). Searches were performed in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus. The review was registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). Risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane RoB2 tool. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to estimate pooled placebo response rates (95% confidence intervals [CIs]), with further exploration of clinical and design factors associated with increased placebo responses through subgroup analyses, meta‑regression, and Pearson correlation analyses.

resultsOverall, 33 RCTs, described in 43 publications and including 2382 placebo-treated participants, were included in this analysis. At the primary endpoint timepoint, the pooled proportion of placebo-treated participants (n = 424 in 14 trials) achieving ≥ 50% reduction in CLASI-A (CLASI‑A50) was 42% (95% CI, 35-50). The CLASI‑A50 placebo responses were 21% at Week 8, 33% at Week 24, and reached 46% at Week 52 for up to 8 trials (n = 150 to 278). Univariate analyses revealed higher placebo responses in studies initiated after 2016, those with follow‑up durations > 24 weeks, and those requiring stable background therapy. Study start year and primary endpoint timepoint were identified as the most influential predictors of placebo response in a meta-regression analysis. A positive correlation was also observed between the proportion of White participants and CLASI-A50 placebo responses.

conclusionsThese findings suggest that limiting background therapy, shortening follow-up durations, and ensuring balanced racial representation should be further explored to reduce placebo responses in future CLE trials. Such strategies may improve signal detection and accelerate the development of effective systemic therapies for cutaneous lupus. PROSPERO record: CRD42024558334.

Indexed as

Lupus Erythematosus, CutaneousPlacebo EffectRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicHumansSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.