ReviewJournal of gastrointestinal cancer2026
FOLFOX in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Current Evidence and Future Role as a Cisplatin-Sparing Chemoimmunotherapy Backbone.
Review in Journal of gastrointestinal cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fluorouracil plus cisplatin has historically served as the dominant platinum-fluoropyrimidine backbone for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). In the immunotherapy era, the key practical question is not whether oxaliplatin can universally replace cisplatin, but whether FOLFOX can provide a rational, patient-centered cisplatin-sparing backbone for selected patients receiving first-line chemoimmunotherapy. CheckMate 648 established nivolumab plus chemotherapy using fluorouracil plus cisplatin, whereas RATIONALE-306 demonstrated that oxaliplatin-containing backbones can be incorporated into successful global phase III immunochemotherapy. Recent Japanese retrospective data in cisplatin-unfit patients showed clinically meaningful activity of nivolumab plus FOLFOX, with reduced renal and hydration burden, outpatient feasibility, and treatment continuity representing potential practical advantages. Oxaliplatin-induced immunogenic cell death provides an additional mechanistic rationale, although this remains predominantly preclinical. Prospective evaluation is underway in Japan through the FLONTALE and OXA-REPLACE phase II trials. This review summarizes the clinical and biological rationale, current evidence, limitations, and future positioning of nivolumab plus FOLFOX. At present, it should be regarded as an emerging selective strategy rather than an established alternative to cisplatin-based chemoimmunotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42611109What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.