ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2026
The volume-outcome relationship for incisional hernia repair: analysis of an administrative dataset for England.
Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIncisional hernia is a common complication following abdominal surgery and repair can be complex. We aimed to use an administrative dataset for England to investigate the relationship between surgeon and provider volumes and outcomes.
methodsWe used data from the Hospital Episodes Statistics database for adult incisional hernia repair conducted in England from 1st April 2013 to 31st March 2025. The exposure variables were annual surgeon and provider volume defined as the number of procedures conducted in the 12 months prior to the index procedure. The primary outcome was reintervention surgery within two-years. Secondary outcomes were reintervention surgery at one and five years, length of stay greater than the median, 30-day all-cause emergency readmission and post-surgery complications. The relationship was modelled using multilevel, multivariable logistic regression with adjustment for prespecified covariates.
resultsData were available for 75,664 incisional hernia repairs conducted by 4355 surgeons within 165 providers. There was a significant relationship between greater surgeon annual volume and lower rates of reintervention surgery at two years (OR 0.995 (95% CI 0.992 to 0.998), p = 0.002) and five years (OR 0.994 (95% CI 0.991 to 0.997), p < 0.001) and between greater hospital provider volume and stay greater than the median (OR 1.001 (95% CI 1.000 to 1.002), p = 0.004). There was no relationship between volume and other short-term surgical outcomes.
conclusionsA relationship exists between lower surgeon volume and higher rates of reintervention surgery for incisional hernia repair. There was no relationship between lower surgeon or provider volume and poorer peri-surgical complications. Setting minimum surgeon annual volume thresholds may help to improve repair rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42611107What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.