Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42611106›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2026

Anaerobic metabolic responses of sludge and mine wastewater-derived consortia to winery wastewater-related compounds.

Ana Baía, Alonso I Arroyo-Escoto, Nuno Ramos, César Afonso, Gaetano R Pesce, Maria C Fernandes, Annabel Fernandes

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ana BaíaFiber Materials and Environmental Technologies (FibEnTech-UBI), Universidade da Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal.
Alonso I Arroyo-EscotoAlentejo Biotechnology Center for Agriculture and Agro-Food (CEBAL), Polytechnic Institute of Beja (IPBeja), Beja, Portugal.
Nuno RamosDepartment of Chemistry, Universidade da Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal.
César AfonsoFiber Materials and Environmental Technologies (FibEnTech-UBI), Universidade da Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal.
Gaetano R PesceDepartment of Agronomy, Natural Resources, Animals and Environment-DAFNAE, University of Padua, Agripolis Campus, Food, Legnaro, PD, Italy.
Maria C FernandesAlentejo Biotechnology Center for Agriculture and Agro-Food (CEBAL), Polytechnic Institute of Beja (IPBeja), Beja, Portugal. maria.fernandes@cebal.pt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1977-8771
Annabel FernandesFiber Materials and Environmental Technologies (FibEnTech-UBI), Universidade da Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal. annabelf@ubi.pt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9007-5342

Funding

European Regional Development Fund ALT2030-FEDER-01951700Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia 2022.02566.PTDCFundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia 2022.11077.BDFundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia UI/BD/153579/2022Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia UID/00195/2025Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia UIDB/05183/2025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Winery wastewater contains readily biodegradable organic matter, but some of its components can inhibit anaerobic microbial activity. This study compares two enriched microbial consortia, derived from anaerobic digester sludge (ADS) and mining-process wastewater (MPW), exposed to alcohols, carboxylic acids, and phenolics. Assays were conducted in acetate-fumarate-based media containing low or high concentrations of each compound class and a combined condition containing the compounds at their highest levels. Growth, fumarate consumption, succinate production, acetate turnover, and compound consumption were monitored. Full-length 16 S rRNA gene sequencing showed that ADS was dominated by Proteus (56.9%) and Escherichia (28.6%). MPW showed a more even profile dominated by Proteus (35.8%), Wolinella (32.9%), and Escherichia (23.0%). Under control conditions, MPW showed higher growth (0.284 vs. 0.181 h

Indexed as

BacteriaMicrobial ConsortiaSewageWastewaterWineAlcoholsAnaerobiosisBiodegradation, EnvironmentalBioreactorsCarboxylic AcidsFumaratesMiningPhenolsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSuccinic AcidAlcoholsCarboxylic AcidsFumaratesPhenolsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSewageSuccinic AcidWastewaterAgro-industrial wastewaterAnaerobic metabolismFull-length 16S rRNA sequencingFumarate respirationMixed microbial communitiesPhenolic stress

Identifiers

PMID42611106
PMCPMC13486130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.