ReviewJournal of gastrointestinal cancer2026
KRAS G12C-mutated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Current Therapeutic Strategies and Future Directions.
Review in Journal of gastrointestinal cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
KRAS G12C mutations define a small but clinically important molecular subset of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), accounting for approximately 3% to 4% of cases and remaining associated with substantial unmet need after standard chemotherapy. Although direct KRAS G12C inhibitors have transformed treatment in other tumor types, their activity as monotherapy in mCRC has been modest, largely because colorectal cancer retains strong upstream EGFR and receptor tyrosine kinase dependency with adaptive MAPK pathway reactivation. These observations provide the biologic rationale for combined KRAS G12C and EGFR inhibition. Clinical results are line- and regimen-dependent: sotorasib plus panitumumab improved progression-free survival compared with standard later-line therapy in the randomized phase 3 CodeBreaK 300 trial, whereas adagrasib plus cetuximab demonstrated clinically meaningful activity in KRYSTAL-1 but did not improve progression-free or overall survival versus chemotherapy in the second-line phase 3 KRYSTAL-10 trial despite a higher objective response rate. Available evidence should therefore be interpreted with appropriate caution. Moreover, acquired resistance remains common and frequently polyclonal, involving secondary KRAS alterations, receptor tyrosine kinase bypass, and downstream pathway reactivation. In this review, we summarize the biologic rationale, current clinical evidence, practical guideline-based positioning, toxicity management considerations, resistance mechanisms, and emerging therapeutic strategies for KRAS G12C-mutated mCRC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42611092What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.