Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42611062›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2026

"Like Taking Part in Star Wars": Qualitative Study Using Thematic Analysis to Explore the Acceptability and Experiences of Older Adults Participating in Remote Longitudinal Sleep and Dementia Research.

Bijetri Biswas, Victoria Grace Gabb, Jonathan Blackman, Hamish Morrison, Elizabeth Coulthard, Anne Roudaut

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bijetri Biswas *Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Bristol, Bristol, England, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3995-2693
Victoria Grace Gabb *ReMemBr Group, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, England, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7688-766X
Jonathan BlackmanReMemBr Group, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, England, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9579-9860
Hamish MorrisonReMemBr Group, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, England, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9358-7936
Elizabeth CoulthardReMemBr Group, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, England, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0017-9595
Anne RoudautFaculty of Science and Engineering, University of Bristol, Bristol, England, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3082-4564

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Sleep disturbance is a common symptom of and potential risk factor for neurodegeneration and dementia. Remote monitoring technologies and increasing digital literacy offer promise for monitoring symptoms and treatment responses via sleep and cognitive assessments from patients' homes. However, the acceptability of remote sleep and circadian research in older adults with and without cognitive impairment is not known. Objective: This study aimed to explore and describe the barriers, facilitators, and user experience of older adults participating in longitudinal sleep and dementia research using remote monitoring technologies. Methods: Older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia due to probable Alzheimer disease or Lewy body disease and age-matched controls participated in an 8-week remote study involving multimodal assessments of sleep and cognition, including actigraphy, wireless electroencephalography, web-based cognitive tasks, and serial saliva samples. Participants were asked for feedback via questionnaires during the study at 2 time points and purposively invited to complete end-of-study interviews about their experiences. The Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behavior model of behavior change, and the extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology, were used to guide questionnaire and interview topic guide development. Inductive reflexive thematic analysis was undertaken, with components from the models used as sensitizing concepts. Results: A total of 14 participants (9 with MCI or dementia, 5 controls) completed end-of-study interviews, and 28 participants (9 with MCI or dementia, 19 controls) completed questionnaires. Six key themes were identified: (1) "Perceived value as motivation," (2) "Trust and simplicity as cornerstones in user experience," (3) "Adjusting to study participation over time," (4) "Adherence, accuracy, and getting it right," (5) "Social support as a facilitator and a barrier," and (6) "Reflections, realities, and uncertainties around sleep." Conclusions: Older adults with and without cognitive impairment were motivated to engage in longitudinal remote sleep research and provide good quality data. Acceptability was related to burden, usability, and reliability of devices, having sufficient support, and ability to build study tasks into a routine. In repeated cognitive tasks, varying task content and difficulty, and allowing flexibility in timing may avoid fatigue and frustration. Future studies should aim to identify effective strategies for recruiting diverse populations, particularly those with limited technology experience or from underserved communities, to ensure equitable participation and representation in research. Providing education on the importance of sleep for brain health and technology use may be beneficial.

Indexed as

DementiaSleepAgedAged, 80 and overCognitive DysfunctionDigital HealthFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleQualitative ResearchRemote Patient Monitoringacceptabilitydementiadigital healthengagementmild cognitive impairmentpatient-centered researchsleeptechnologyusabilitywearables

Identifiers

PMID42611062
PMCPMC13483754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.