Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42611056›Full record

ReviewGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2026

Ethical considerations in generative artificial intelligence for synthetic data generation in ophthalmology.

Kadircan Hidir Keskinbora, Fatih Sinan Esen

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kadircan Hidir KeskinboraSchool of Medicine, Bahcesehir University, İncirli Cad. 43-5, Bakırköy, 34147, Istanbul, Türkiye. hidirkadircan.keskinbora@bau.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1940-1026
Fatih Sinan EsenScientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye (TUBITAK), Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6955-4269

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) is beginning to reshape medical research, with ophthalmology at the forefront of this transformation. This narrative review examines the ethical considerations and challenges of using generative AI - particularly Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) and diffusion models - to create synthetic data for ophthalmic research. Synthetic data offers genuine solutions to long-standing obstacles: data scarcity, augmentation of datasets for rare diseases, and privacy-preserving multi-institutional collaboration. Yet the same capabilities introduce formidable risks. Key concerns include patient re-identification from ostensibly anonymous synthetic data, the perpetuation and amplification of algorithmic biases inherent in source datasets, the prospect of scientific misconduct through "deepfake" medical images, and unresolved questions of data ownership, governance, and legal liability. Clinical validity cannot be inferred from computational metrics alone; it requires a multi-faceted evaluation framework that incorporates expert clinical review and downstream task performance. To harness the potential of generative AI while mitigating its risks, a proactive, interdisciplinary approach is essential - combining rigorous technical validation with ethical oversight and clear regulatory guidance. This article concludes with policy recommendations to foster responsible innovation and ensure that this powerful technology is developed and deployed safely, equitably, and aligned with the core tenets of scientific integrity and patient care.

Indexed as

Data privacyDiffusion modelsGenerative adversarial networks (GANs)Generative artificial intelligenceMedical ethicsOphthalmologySynthetic data generation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.