Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42610959›Full record

Observational studyThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2026

Prospective evaluation of imipenem trough concentrations and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients.

Mia Madeleine Lidén, Filippo Boroli, Elodie Von Dach, Pierre Lescuyer, David Tonoli, Angela Huttner, OPTIMAL TDM Study Group, on behalf of

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mia Madeleine LidénPaediatric Department, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Rue Willy-Donzé 6, Geneva 1205, Switzerland.ORCID 0009-0009-5207-2931
Filippo BoroliIntensive Care Unit, Geneva University Hospitals, Rue Gabrielle Perret-Gentil 4, Geneva 1205, Switzerland.
Elodie Von DachCentre for Clinical Research, Clinical Trials Unit, University Hospital and University of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle Perret-Gentil 4, Geneva 1205, Switzerland.
Pierre LescuyerToxicology and Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Laboratory, Geneva University Hospitals, Rue Gabrielle Perret-Gentil 4, Geneva 1205, Switzerland.
David TonoliToxicology and Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Laboratory, Geneva University Hospitals, Rue Gabrielle Perret-Gentil 4, Geneva 1205, Switzerland.
Angela HuttnerInfectious Disease Division, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Rue Gabrielle Perret-Gentil 4, Geneva 1205, Switzerland.
OPTIMAL TDM Study Group
on behalf of

Funding

Geneva University Hospital Research and Developpement PRD 8-2017-2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImipenem is a broad-spectrum antibiotic commonly used in critically ill patients, whose pharmacokinetic profile can be highly variable. While imipenem therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is being adopted increasingly, efficacy and toxicity plasma thresholds remain incompletely defined. Few studies have prospectively and systematically assessed imipenem concentrations in severely ill patients before clinical failure or toxicity events occur.

methodsThis prospective observational cohort study conducted at the University Hospitals of Geneva consecutively included all adult patients hospitalized for suspected or confirmed severe bacterial infections in the haematology, intermediate care and intensive care units whose clinicians prescribed imipenem. On inclusion, patients underwent imipenem plasma-concentration monitoring, with trough levels measured at steady state. We assessed the frequency of adverse events and clinical success over a 30-day period.

resultsOf 142 patients undergoing imipenem monitoring, 106 had trough levels drawn at steady state. The median trough concentration was 2.4 mg/L (IQR 1.2-4.0). Among all patients, adverse events occurred in 4.9% (7/142), while clinical success was achieved in 88/106 with trough levels (83%). No significant differences in trough levels were observed between patients with and without clinical success or with and without adverse events. Renal clearance had a significant impact on trough levels.

conclusionProspective, universally applied imipenem monitoring reveals lower trough levels than previously described. Nonetheless, this cohort of critically ill and/or immunosuppressed patients still experienced high rates of clinical success, with few adverse events. While low trough concentrations did not predict failure, rare outlying higher concentrations (10-20 mg/L) also did not predict toxicity.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial InfectionsCritical IllnessImipenemAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDrug MonitoringFemaleHospitals, UniversityHumansMaleMiddle AgedPlasmaProspective StudiesSwitzerlandAnti-Bacterial AgentsImipenem

Identifiers

PMID42610959
PMCPMC13482977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.