Observational studyThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2026
Prospective evaluation of imipenem trough concentrations and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients.
Observational study in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundImipenem is a broad-spectrum antibiotic commonly used in critically ill patients, whose pharmacokinetic profile can be highly variable. While imipenem therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is being adopted increasingly, efficacy and toxicity plasma thresholds remain incompletely defined. Few studies have prospectively and systematically assessed imipenem concentrations in severely ill patients before clinical failure or toxicity events occur.
methodsThis prospective observational cohort study conducted at the University Hospitals of Geneva consecutively included all adult patients hospitalized for suspected or confirmed severe bacterial infections in the haematology, intermediate care and intensive care units whose clinicians prescribed imipenem. On inclusion, patients underwent imipenem plasma-concentration monitoring, with trough levels measured at steady state. We assessed the frequency of adverse events and clinical success over a 30-day period.
resultsOf 142 patients undergoing imipenem monitoring, 106 had trough levels drawn at steady state. The median trough concentration was 2.4 mg/L (IQR 1.2-4.0). Among all patients, adverse events occurred in 4.9% (7/142), while clinical success was achieved in 88/106 with trough levels (83%). No significant differences in trough levels were observed between patients with and without clinical success or with and without adverse events. Renal clearance had a significant impact on trough levels.
conclusionProspective, universally applied imipenem monitoring reveals lower trough levels than previously described. Nonetheless, this cohort of critically ill and/or immunosuppressed patients still experienced high rates of clinical success, with few adverse events. While low trough concentrations did not predict failure, rare outlying higher concentrations (10-20 mg/L) also did not predict toxicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.