Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42610906›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2026

MolDeTr: A Chemistry-Informed Deep Learning Model for Next-Generation Automated Analysis of 1H NMR Spectra.

Nicolas Schmid, Marc Wanner, Giulia Fischetti, Andreas Henrici, Mohsen Meshkian, Simon Bruderer, Rudolf M Füchslin, Björn Heitmann, Jan Dirk Wegner, Roland K O Sigel and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. 2D-JCOG: Transforming 1DAnalytical chemistry · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Nicolas SchmidInstitute of Applied Mathematics and Physics (IAMP), Zurich University of Applied Sciences (ZHAW), Technikumstrasse 71, 8401Winterthur, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1930-7654
Marc WannerComputer Vision Laboratory (CVL), ETH Zurich, Sternwartstrasse 7, 8092Zurich, Switzerland.
Giulia FischettiInstitute of Applied Mathematics and Physics (IAMP), Zurich University of Applied Sciences (ZHAW), Technikumstrasse 71, 8401Winterthur, Switzerland.
Andreas HenriciInstitute of Applied Mathematics and Physics (IAMP), Zurich University of Applied Sciences (ZHAW), Technikumstrasse 71, 8401Winterthur, Switzerland.ORCID 0009-0008-5124-604X
Mohsen MeshkianInstitute of Applied Mathematics and Physics (IAMP), Zurich University of Applied Sciences (ZHAW), Technikumstrasse 71, 8401Winterthur, Switzerland.
Simon BrudererBruker Switzerland AG , Industriestrasse 26, 8117Fällanden, Switzerland.
Rudolf M FüchslinInstitute of Applied Mathematics and Physics (IAMP), Zurich University of Applied Sciences (ZHAW), Technikumstrasse 71, 8401Winterthur, Switzerland.
Björn HeitmannBruker Switzerland AG , Industriestrasse 26, 8117Fällanden, Switzerland.
Jan Dirk WegnerDepartment of Mathematical Modeling and Machine Learning (DM3L), University of Zurich (UZH), Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057Zurich, Switzerland.
Roland K O SigelDepartment of Chemistry, University of Zurich (UZH), Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1307-7993
Dirk WilhelmInstitute of Applied Mathematics and Physics (IAMP), Zurich University of Applied Sciences (ZHAW), Technikumstrasse 71, 8401Winterthur, Switzerland.

Funding

Innosuisse - Schweizerische Agentur f?r Innovationsf?rderung 2155007318
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate interpretation of one-dimensional proton nuclear magnetic resonance (1H NMR) spectra remains a rate-limiting step in molecular structure elucidation, particularly when signal overlap, strong spin coupling, and instrumental distortions mask key features. Existing automated approaches depend on computationally intensive and sensitive iterative quantum-mechanical fitting and still require expert oversight. Here we introduce MolDeTr, a chemistry-informed deep-learning framework derived from the detection-transformer architecture that unifies peak picking, multiplet identification, and extraction of chemical shifts, scalar coupling constants, relaxation-dependent decay times, and proton counts in a single-network pass. The method targets prototypical spin systems of single-component small molecules in 1D 1H NMR, with up to ten distinct groups of chemically equivalent spins (multiplets). MolDeTr is trained exclusively on synthetic spectra generated by spin-dynamics simulations and augmented with realistic experimental artifacts, enabling it to generalize to unseen compounds─including experimental spectra with overlapping and strongly coupled multiplets─without reference standards or prior spin-system knowledge. Unlike structure-conditioned shift-prediction or calculation models, e.g., density functional theory (DFT), that assume the molecular structure is known, MolDeTr addresses the spectrum-conditioned inverse problem and extracts spin-system parameters directly from measured 1D 1H NMR spectra, thereby substantially improving chemical-shift prediction precision by one to 2 orders of magnitude compared to existing structure-conditioned approaches. Benchmarking against a diverse experimental set of 1H NMR spectra of modestly sized small molecules, spanning 80 to 600 MHz base frequency, shows median absolute errors of 0.89 Hz for chemical shifts and 0.20 Hz for coupling constants, while absolute proton counts are predicted with 93.5% accuracy, outperforming state-of-the-art spectrum analysis software and experienced spectroscopists. By eliminating iterative fitting and expert intervention, MolDeTr offers a scalable route to fully automated spectral analysis, accelerating molecular discovery across the chemical sciences.

Identifiers

PMID42610906
PMCPMC13492045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.