Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42610760›Full record

ReviewThe European journal of general practice2026

Beyond diagnosis in general practice: Predictive processing, a novel framework for persistent physical symptoms.

Kees van Boven, Peter Lucassen, Tim C Olde Hartman, Omer Van den Bergh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The European journal of general practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kees van BovenDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Peter LucassenDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Tim C Olde HartmanDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Omer Van den BerghDepartment of Health Psychology, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPersistent physical symptoms are among the most common and challenging presentations in general practice, whether investigations are normal or reveal pathology insufficient to explain their severity. Patients and clinicians alike often experience these presentations as a dead end. Traditional biomedical models assume that symptoms passively reflect structural pathology, and that normal test results imply the absence of illness.

objectivesTo introduce predictive processing as a theoretical framework for understanding persistent physical symptoms in general practice, and to outline its implications for clinical explanation and management.

methodsThis opinion paper draws on the predictive processing and active inference literature to develop a clinically applicable account of symptom perception, illustrated with clinical scenarios from general practice.

resultsPredictive processing proposes that symptoms are active perceptual constructions, generated by the brain as it infers the state of the body from incoming signals and prior beliefs. When prior beliefs of danger or irreversibility are strong, and peripheral signals are weak or ambiguous, these prior beliefs can dominate perception, producing substantial suffering in the absence of clear pathology. This framework explains symptom-test discordance and reframes normal results: they do not end clinical responsibility, but shift it towards modifying symptom-sustaining priors towards expectations of safety and recovery.

conclusionFor the general practitioner, this framework provides a coherent scientific rationale for explanation, continuity of care, expectation management, cognitive approaches and graded activity. These interventions emerge as core clinical tools, not consolation, when "nothing is found".

Indexed as

General PracticeMedically Unexplained SymptomsHumansclinical explanationgeneral practicePersistent physical symptomspredictive processingprior beliefssymptom–test discordance

Identifiers

PMID42610760
PMCPMC13488502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.