SynthesisWiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology
Quantum Dots in Ocular Surface: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Quantum Dots in Ocular Surface: A Systematic Review.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnologyPooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The current advancements in quantum dot-based ocular surface applications identify critical gaps in existing research. A systematic search was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Articles were retrieved from PubMed and Scopus using keywords including "quantum dots," "semiconductor nanocrystals," "ocular surface," "tear film," "cornea," "conjunctiva," "lacrimal glands," and "meibomian glands" with Boolean conjunctions. A total of 232 studies were initially selected based on titles and abstracts. After removing duplicates and screening, 21 studies were selected for review. A variety of QDs, including carbon, graphene, silicon, cadmium and gold-based, have been explored for bioimaging and therapeutic applications targeting the ocular surface. Carbon and silicon-based QDs are the most biocompatible. Surface functionalization of these QDs facilitates targeted imaging of tear film layers, conjunctiva, and cornea with stable fluorescence and minimal toxicity. QDs can also be antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and scavenge reactive oxygen species which might be used for the treatment of dry eye disease. Although cadmium-based QDs exhibit superior fluorescence, their cytotoxicity limits their clinical application. The optical properties of QDs are influenced by physicochemical properties such as particle size, surface charge, and surface functionalization. QDs represent a promising class of nanoscale materials for diagnostic and therapeutic applications on the ocular surface. While biocompatible variants of QDs, such as carbon and silicon QDs, show potential for clinical use, there is limited information on the standardized synthesis protocols, long-term cytotoxicity, systemic biodistribution, and clearance from ocular tissues. This article is categorized under: Nanotechnology Approaches to Biology > Nanoscale Systems in Biology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.