ReviewThoracic cancer2026
Multidisciplinary Team Care for Early-Stage Lung Cancer in Low- and Middle-Income Countries and Emerging Economies: Current Position and Call for Action.
Review in Thoracic cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lung cancer (LC) is a complex cancer marked by poor prognosis. Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and emerging economies have witnessed a growing burden of LC in recent years due to low symptom awareness, rising tobacco use, air pollution, and pulmonary infections. Managing LC optimally requires a multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach to support accurate diagnosis, staging, and treatment. MDT presentation has been linked to timely diagnosis and staging, receipt of surgery, and survival benefits in early-stage LC (ESLC). However, delivering high-quality ESLC care through an MDT approach remains challenging in LMICs and emerging economies. Weak organizational structure, fragmentation of the financing and health system, oncology workforce deficits, and unawareness of the potential impact of MDTs hinder optimal care. Systematic identification, analysis, and reporting of barriers to ESLC care are critical for improving care quality and informing effective corrective interventions. This article aimed to explore barriers to MDT implementation that are unique to the care of patients with ESLC in LMICs and emerging economies and developed evidence-informed recommendations for strengthening MDT care pathways. Key focus areas addressed by these recommendations include the composition of the MDT panel for ESLC management, standardizing MDT processes and guidelines, defining standardized datasets for data collection and internal MDT review, data sharing practices, and streamlining decision-making processes. This guidance document also provides a rational framework for improved standardized MDT care in ESLC (RISE-LC) to guide the implementation and optimization of MDT care in resource-constrained settings, aiming to improve timely diagnosis, treatment coordination, and patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.