Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42610623›Full record

ArticleJournal of primary care & community health

Long-Term Care Residents' Experiences of Telemedicine - Video Consultations With Their Regular Physician in Rural Northern Sweden.

Lina Ärlebrant, Anna-Karin Hurtig, Anette Edin-Liljegren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of primary care & community health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lina ÄrlebrantDepartment of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0009-0007-0814-8412
Anna-Karin HurtigDepartment of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Anette Edin-LiljegrenDepartment of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

IntroductionDemand for long-term care is increasing globally due to ageing populations and workforce shortages, particularly in rural areas. Video consultations (VC) may support interactions between residents and healthcare professionals and gained prominence during the Covid-19 pandemic. However, research on long-term care residents' experiences of VC remains limited, and ethical challenges have been highlighted. This study aims to explore residents' experiences of VC.MethodsA qualitative study with an inductive approach was conducted. Interviews (n=10) were carried out with long-term care residents aged 59-96 who had used VC with their designated physician, across three rural municipalities in northern Sweden. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.ResultsTwo themes and six subthemes were identified: (1) Emotional Experience of being Connected yet Apart, and (2) Conditions that Enable, Shape, and Separate.ConclusionExperiences were shaped by individual preferences and contextual factors rather than age, with physician behaviour playing a central role. Although attitudes towards VC are becoming more positive, it should remain a complement to face-to-face consultations. Risks such as reduced autonomy, privacy concerns and technical limitations must be addressed. Familiar providers and tailored solutions may enhance autonomy, while VC may also foster courage and empowerment.

Indexed as

COVID-19Long-Term CareRemote ConsultationTelemedicineVideoconferencingAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedNursing Home ResidentsPhysician-Patient RelationsQualitative ResearchRural Health ServiceseHealthlong-term carequalitativeremote consultationsruraltelehealthvideo consultations

Identifiers

PMID42610623
PMCPMC13487111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.