Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42610563›Full record

Observational studyGeriatrics & gerontology international2026

What Should Be Assessed Next After a Positive Screening Test for the Long-Term Care Needs?: A Comparative Analysis of the Clinical Frailty Scale, the Kihon Checklist, and the Dementia Assessment Sheet for Community-Based Integrated Care System-8 Items.

Sayuri Mori, Kenji Toyoshima, Yoshiaki Tamura, Yuji Murao, Fumino Kobayashi, Aya Tachibana, Remi Kodera, Kazuhito Oba, Yuko Chiba, Joji Ishikawa and 1 more

Abstract readObservational StudyComparative Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Geriatrics & gerontology international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sayuri MoriDepartment of Diabetes, Metabolism, and Endocrinology, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3479-5955
Kenji ToyoshimaDepartment of Diabetes, Metabolism, and Endocrinology, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1220-273X
Yoshiaki TamuraDepartment of Diabetes, Metabolism, and Endocrinology, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuji MuraoThe Center for Comprehensive Care and Research for Prefrailty, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan.
Fumino KobayashiThe Center for Comprehensive Care and Research for Prefrailty, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan.
Aya TachibanaDepartment of Diabetes, Metabolism, and Endocrinology, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan.
Remi KoderaDepartment of Diabetes, Metabolism, and Endocrinology, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan.
Kazuhito ObaDepartment of Diabetes, Metabolism, and Endocrinology, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuko ChibaDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan.
Joji IshikawaThe Center for Comprehensive Care and Research for Prefrailty, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8669-815X
Atsushi ArakiDepartment of Diabetes, Metabolism, and Endocrinology, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9088-2841

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe Kihon Checklist (KCL), Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), and Dementia Assessment Sheet for Community-Based Integrated Care System-8 items (DASC-8) predict incident long-term care needs (LTCN) certification. We aimed to identify additional factors associated with incident LTCN certification among older adults who screened positive on any tool.

methodsIn this retrospective observational cohort study, we included patients aged ≥ 65 years attending a frailty outpatient clinic and had no LTCN certification at baseline. Positive screening was defined as CFS, KCL, and DASC-8 scores ≥ 4, 8, and 11, respectively. Within each screening-positive group, Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for age and sex were used to examine associations between incident LTCN certification and secondary assessment variables: gait speed, timed up and go (TUG), cognitive function, psychosocial factors, nutrition, and polypharmacy.

resultsAmong 647 participants, 198, 137, and 112 screened positive on the KCL, CFS, and DASC-8, respectively. Slower gait speed and longer TUG time were associated with incident LTCN certification across all screening-positive groups. Cognitive impairment, defined as Mini-Mental State Examination and Montreal Cognitive Assessment-Japanese version scores ≤ 23 and 25, respectively, predicted incident LTCN certification in CFS-positive and KCL-positive groups, respectively. Polypharmacy (≥ 6 medications) was associated with incident LTCN certification in KCL-positive and DASC-8-positive individuals.

conclusionsPhysical function tests were additional factors associated with incident LTCN certification in all screening-positive groups. As the association between incident LTCN certification and cognitive impairment or polypharmacy varied per screening tests, further evaluations should be tailored to the specific characteristics of each instrument.

Indexed as

ChecklistDementiaFrailtyGeriatric AssessmentLong-Term CareMass ScreeningAgedAged, 80 and overDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedFemaleFrail ElderlyHumansMaleNeeds AssessmentRetrospective StudiesClinical Frailty ScaleDementia Assessment Sheet for Community‐Based Integrated Care System–8 itemsfrailtyKihon Checklistlong‐term care needs

Identifiers

PMID42610563
PMCPMC13482530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.