Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42610448›Full record

ArticleThoracic research and practice2026

Ultrasound- versus CT-guided Biopsy of Pleural-contact Pulmonary Lesions: A Comparative Analysis of Diagnostic Performance and Procedural Complications.

Mustafa Yeşilyurt, Esra Pınar, Ahmet Tuğrul Akkuş, Adem Karaman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Thoracic research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mustafa YeşilyurtDepartment of Radiology, Atatürk University Faculty of Medicine, Erzurum, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-7605-4940
Esra PınarDepartment of Radiology, Atatürk University Faculty of Medicine, Erzurum, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-7711-1281
Ahmet Tuğrul AkkuşClinic of Radiology, Kağızman State Hospital, Kars, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-5269-2502
Adem KaramanDepartment of Radiology, Atatürk University Faculty of Medicine, Erzurum, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-3091-0609

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the diagnostic performance and complication profiles of ultrasound (US)-guided and computed tomography (CT)-guided biopsy in pleural-contact pulmonary lesions and to evaluate technical factors associated with pneumothorax development after CT-guided biopsy. MATERIAL AND

methodsThis retrospective single-center study included 197 patients with pleural-contact pulmonary lesions who underwent image-guided transthoracic core needle biopsy between January 2023 and March 2026. Of these, 123 underwent CT-guided biopsies and 74 underwent US-guided biopsies. Diagnostic adequacy, diagnostic accuracy, and procedure-related complications were compared between the groups. Factors associated with pneumothorax after CT-guided biopsy were evaluated using univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses.

resultsDiagnostic adequacy was comparable between CT-guided and US-guided biopsies (93.5% vs. 89.2%,

conclusionUS-guided biopsy of pleural-contact pulmonary lesions demonstrated diagnostic adequacy and diagnostic accuracy comparable to CT-guided biopsy and was associated with lower pneumothorax and chest tube placement rates in this retrospective cohort. When an adequate acoustic window and pleural contact are present, US guidance may be a safe and effective alternative biopsy approach for appropriately selected pleural-contact pulmonary lesions.

Indexed as

Biopsydiagnostic accuracylung neoplasmsneedlepneumothoraxtomographyultrasonographyX-ray computed

Identifiers

PMID42610448
PMCPMC13548739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.