Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42610350›Full record

ArticleJournal of morphology2026

Why Some Bryozoans Poop Themselves: A Novel Defecation Method in Ctenostome Bryozoans.

Thomas Schwaha, Sebastian H Decker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of morphology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Thomas SchwahaUniversity of Vienna, Evolutionary Biology, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0526-6791
Sebastian H DeckerUniversity of Vienna, Evolutionary Biology, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9029-8717

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Feeding in animal colonies is a challenging but important aspect in organisms comprised of numerous zooids. Among bryozoans, general aspects of colonial feeding currents were studied in detail, whereas zooidal defecation has received little attention. In case of bryozoan colonies with closely situated zooids, feeding currents show interzooidal interference, but this also applies to defecation and faeces removal. More recently, it was recognized that the position of the anus among ctenostome bryozoans is variable, located either close to the base of the tentacle crown, similar to other bryozoan clades, or distally at the vestibulum. The latter case, with a so-called vestibular anus, remained functionally unexplored. Here we report first investigations into the defecation process of alcyonidioidean ctenostome bryozoans, which possess a vestibular anus distally of the retracted tentacle crown or lophophore. Defecation occurs with retracted polypides and the faecal pellets are transferred into the tentacle sheath on top of the retracted lophophore. This mechanism allows the bryozoan to release faeces via the atrium by the general polypide protrusion mechanism. Unlike other bryozoans with typical lophophoral anus, this enables defecation without protruding their entire tentacle crowns. This could yield protection of the lophophore, an advantage in predator avoidance and also capability of defecation at low tide for intertidal species. This 'lophophore-push poop removal' might be an efficient way of faeces removal within the colony and appears to reduce interferences with colonial feeding currents. Whereas colonies in this clade of bryozoans always show dense aggregations of zooids, it would be interesting to study bryozoans with vestibular anus and less dense colonies.

Indexed as

BryozoaDefecationAnimalsFeeding Behavioranusfaeceslophophore‐push poop removalLophotrochozoa

Identifiers

PMID42610350
PMCPMC13482725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.