ReviewEuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology2026
Computational wireless indices for the assessment of myocardial ischaemia.
Review in EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The assessment of myocardial ischaemia is entering a new computational era. Beyond the traditional boundaries of anatomical imaging and invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR), emerging techniques based on coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography and invasive coronary artery angiography now allow the derivation of physiological information without pressure wires, hyperaemic agents, or additional procedures. These image-based indices, commonly referred to as FFR-CT and angiography-derived FFR, are reshaping both diagnostic and interventional cardiology. This review provides an updated synthesis of the latest evidence on their clinical integration. FFR-CT has demonstrated its ability to refine diagnostic pathways, reduce unnecessary invasive angiography, and safely guide management decisions within precision diagnostic strategies. In parallel, angiography-derived FFR has matured into a real-time wire-free solution within the catheterisation laboratory. Randomised studies confirm that physiology-guided revascularisation improves procedural efficiency and optimises outcomes compared with angiography alone. Beyond ischaemia detection, these technologies now extend to virtual stenting, procedural simulation, and the identification of vulnerable plaques through haemodynamic indices such as endothelial shear stress and perivascular inflammation mapping. Together, these developments mark a paradigm shift: from anatomy-based to physiology-driven and, ultimately, prediction-guided coronary intervention. By merging artificial intelligence, computational modelling, and advanced imaging, CT- and angiography-derived physiology offer the prospect of fully integrated real-time functional assessment. This convergence defines a new frontier in coronary medicine, where precision, automation, and clinical impact coalesce to transform everyday cardiovascular practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.