ArticleSurgical case reports2026
Effective Control of Synchronous Male Breast and Prostate Cancer with Androgen Deprivation Therapy: A Case Report.
Article in Surgical case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMale breast cancer (BC) is a rare disease, accounting for less than 1% of all BCs, and its synchronous occurrence with prostate cancer (PC) is exceedingly rare. Male BC is generally managed according to treatment strategies established for female BC; however, the role of androgen receptor (AR) signaling and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in male BC remains unclear. In particular, the optimal treatment strategy for patients with synchronous male BC and PC has not been established, and it is unknown whether ADT for PC exerts therapeutic effects on AR-positive male BC. CASE PRESENTATION: A 74-year-old Japanese man was diagnosed with synchronous estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, AR-positive, luminal A-like male BC (cStage IIA) and metastatic PC (Stage IV). Given that the prognosis was primarily determined by metastatic PC, ADT consisting of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist and an AR antagonist was initiated prior to breast surgery. Notably, marked tumor regression was observed in the breast lesion during ADT. Subsequent mastectomy with sentinel lymph node biopsy revealed ypT1c pN0 disease.
conclusionsThis case represents a rare clinical scenario in which standard ADT successfully controlled both metastatic PC and operable ER- and AR-positive male BC without upfront breast surgery. This case suggests that ADT may represent a potential initial therapeutic option for synchronous malignancies, particularly in patients in whom surgery is not feasible or can be deferred.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.