ArticleIranian journal of nursing and midwifery research
Apixaban vs Enoxaparin for Preventing Postoperative Thromboembolic events in Women Undergoing Surgery for Gynecologic Cancers: A Randomized Clinical Trial Study.
Article in Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE), encompassing deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, presents a significant clinical risk for women undergoing surgical intervention for gynecologic malignancies. Enhanced prophylactic strategies are vital to mitigating these complications. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of oral apixaban compared to subcutaneous enoxaparin for postoperative VTE prevention in this high-risk population. Materials and Methods: This randomized clinical trial was conducted from March 2022 to March 2023. One hundred eligible patients undergoing gynecologic cancer surgery were randomized to receive either oral apixaban (2.5 mg twice daily) or subcutaneous enoxaparin (40 mg daily). The primary endpoints included the incidence of thromboembolic events and bleeding complications, monitored up to 12 weeks postoperatively. Results: This cohort consisted of 48 patients in the apixaban group and 52 in the enoxaparin group. Postoperative complications included vaginal bleeding (8.32% apixaban vs. 3.85% enoxaparin), hematoma (2.15% apixaban vs. 3.85% enoxaparin), and ecchymosis (6.37% apixaban vs. 9.62% enoxaparin). None of these differences achieved statistical significance ( Conclusions: Apixaban and enoxaparin demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety profiles in preventing postoperative VTE following gynecologic cancer surgery. Given its oral administration route, apixaban may serve as a feasible alternative to enoxaparin, potentially enhancing patient compliance. Further large-scale studies are warranted to validate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.