ArticleJAMIA open2026
Development and evaluation of a multi-source machine learning model to predict critical illness and death in patients with substance misuse.
Article in JAMIA open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objectives: Patients with substance misuse are at high risk for clinical deterioration, and pre-hospital encounters constitute important risk factors. We sought to incorporate these risk factors into a novel prediction model using linked electronic health record, emergency medical services (EMSs), and claims data. Materials and methods: Using 23 454 hospital encounters, we developed machine-learning models to predict mechanical ventilation, vasopressor initiation, or death within 12 hours of a vital sign or laboratory measurement. Models were compared to the modified early warning score. Results: Extreme gradient boosting achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.93, significantly outperforming modified early warning score (MEWS 0.79). Notably, removing EMS and claims data did not reduce predictive performance. Discussion: The model demonstrated strong predictive performance of clinical deterioration in this high-risk population. Incorporation of pre-hospital risk factors did not improve performance beyond EHR data alone. Conclusion: Electronic health record-based machine learning models can support accurate short-term prediction of clinical deterioration among this population at risk for delayed recognition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.