ArticleAphasiology2026
New patterns of pathological language mixing in bilingual aphasia.
Article in Aphasiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: A central challenge in bilingual aphasia research is the absence of clear markers that distinguish pathological language mixing (PLM) from mixing used as a compensatory mechanism, leaving ongoing debates unresolved. Also, prior work suggests that PLM occurs primarily during retrieval of open-class words and increases with utterance length during structured tasks, yet these findings, and the hesitation behaviors accompanying PLM, remain largely untested in spontaneous speech. Method: This study examines PLM in Patient P3, a 59-year-old female bilingual speaker of Spanish and English with severe Broca's aphasia who showed extensive mixing and reported significant communicative disruption as a result. She was administered the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised in both languages and transcribed samples from her response to narrative prompts were coded for word class and language mixing, and hesitation durations were acoustically analyzed. Results: P3 mixed closed-class words more frequently than open-class words. PLM frequency was unrelated to utterance length, and longer hesitations preceded non-target language intrusions, indicating increased retrieval cost. P3 showed elevated Aphasia Quotients in both languages when cross-language responses were computed, suggesting symmetric (bidirectional) mixing rather than assymetric (unidirectional) compensatory intrusion into the weaker language. Conclusion: Together, these results propose symmetric language mixing and higher hesitation duration preceding non-target intrusions as potential markers of control deficits in bilingual aphasia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.