ReviewCureus2026
Opioid-Sparing Effects of Perioperative Ketamine With Inconsistent Analgesic Benefit in Orthopedic Surgery: A Systematic Review of Controlled Trials.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Effective postoperative pain management following orthopedic surgery remains a challenge, particularly in the context of increasing opioid-related morbidity. Multimodal analgesic strategies incorporate adjuvant therapies such as ketamine to reduce opioid requirements while maintaining adequate pain control. This systematic review evaluated the efficacy and safety of perioperative ketamine as an adjunct to opioid therapy for acute postoperative pain management in adults undergoing orthopedic procedures. A PRISMA-guided search of Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL identified randomized controlled trials published between January 2014 and September 2024. Eligible studies included patients aged 18-65 years undergoing orthopedic surgery who received perioperative ketamine compared to opioid-based regimens. Primary outcomes included postoperative opioid consumption and patient-reported pain scores, while secondary outcomes included adverse events. Risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for Randomized Controlled Trials. Due to heterogeneity in ketamine dosing, administration, and outcome reporting, a qualitative synthesis was performed. Eleven randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. Adjunctive ketamine reduced postoperative opioid consumption in five of 11 studies, with the most consistent effects observed within the first 24 hours postoperatively. Four studies reported statistically significant improvements in patient-reported pain scores, while others demonstrated no significant differences despite reduced opioid use. Ketamine showed a safety profile comparable to opioid-only regimens, with no consistent increase in adverse events; several studies reported reductions in opioid-related side effects such as pruritus and sedation. Perioperative ketamine may reduce postoperative opioid consumption without increasing adverse events, although its effect on pain intensity remains variable. These findings support its use as part of multimodal analgesia strategies aimed at minimizing opioid exposure, though further research is needed to standardize dosing protocols and evaluate long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.