ArticleCJC open2026
MultiECGNet: Evaluation of a Deep-Learning Ensemble Method for Image-Based 12-Lead Electrocardiographic Detection of Atrial Fibrillation.
Article in CJC open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Artificial intelligence holds significant promise for analysis and interpretation of electrocardiograms (ECGs) in cardiovascular disease. However, many ECGs are still stored as paper records or static images, necessitating deep-learning models that can operate on image-based ECG formats. This study aims to evaluate the performance of an ensemble classifier, MultiECGNet, using multi-format ECG images for the diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods: An ensemble classifier was developed using 4 models derived by truncating the pretrained EfficientNet B3 model at different feature extraction layers. Transfer learning was employed to train the ensemble on the publicly available PTB-XL dataset for AF detection. External validation was performed using the Chinese Physiological Society Signal Challenge dataset. ECG samples were converted into 2 image formats (2 x 6 and 4 x 3), and performance was evaluated across same-format, cross-format, and mixed-format classification tasks. Results: The classifier detected AF in the validation dataset with an accuracy of 0.95 with an F1-score of 0.87, comparable to a signal-based model (F1-score: 0.87 vs 0.83) and better than a single EfficientNet-B3 model (F1-score: 0.87 vs 0.71). Training on one ECG format and testing on a different format resulted in reduced performance (F1-score: 0.66-0.71). However, training on a dataset containing a mix of both formats closely matched the performance of the original same-format training (F1-score: 0.86). Conclusions: The proposed image-based ensemble classifier demonstrated comparable performance to a strong signal-based model for AF detection. Although cross-format generalization posed a challenge, incorporating multiple ECG formats during training mitigated this limitation and improved model robustness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.