ArticleCJC open2026
Direct Oral Anticoagulants Compared to Warfarin Early After Cardiac Surgery: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.
Article in CJC open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05006287 (A Randomized Trial of the Safety of Non-vitamin K Oral Anticoagulants Compared to Warfarin Early After Cardiac Surgery), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized Trial of the Safety of Non-vitamin K Oral Anticoagulants Compared to Warfarin Early After Cardiac Surgery: a Pilot Study
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The goal was to conduct a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) early after cardiac surgery to determine the feasibility of a larger RCT. Methods: We conducted an open-label, 2-site, pilot RCT of adults undergoing cardiac surgery with an indication for anticoagulation, excluding mechanical valves and bioprosthetic mitral valve replacements. We randomized patients 1:1 to receive a DOAC or warfarin started during the index hospitalization with a standardized time of postoperative initiation and bridging for high thrombosis risk. The coprimary feasibility outcome goals were recruitment of ≥ 70% eligible patients and adherence to the anticoagulation protocol in ≥ 80% patients. The primary clinical composite outcome included all-cause mortality, major bleeding, stroke, systemic embolism, or pericardial effusion requiring intervention within 3 months. Results: Between October 2022 and February 2024, a total of 547 patients were screened, 163 met inclusion criteria, 104 were randomized, and 100 were analyzed (50 in each group). The median age was 72 years; 22% were female; 54% had preexisting atrial fibrillation; 37% had postoperative atrial fibrillation, with a median Conclusions: Although the a priori recruitment goal was not met, this trial supports the need for and provides valuable insights into key challenges to mitigate, thereby guiding the design of a large, definitive multicentre RCT comparing DOACs vs warfarin in cardiac surgery patients. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT05006287.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.