Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42610000›Full record

ArticleActa medica Lituanica2026

Challenges in the Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis: A Case Report.

Kristina Galinytė, Gintarė Butenytė, Gintarė Žemgulytė, Jurgita Makštienė, Renata Balnytė

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Acta medica Lituanica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kristina GalinytėLithuanian University of Health Sciences, Medical Academy, Faculty of Medicine, Kaunas, Lithuania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6161-3001
Gintarė ButenytėLithuanian University of Health Sciences, Medical Academy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Neurology, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Gintarė ŽemgulytėLithuanian University of Health Sciences, Medical Academy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Neurology, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Jurgita MakštienėLithuanian University of Health Sciences, Medical Academy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pathology, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Renata BalnytėLithuanian University of Health Sciences, Medical Academy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Neurology, Kaunas, Lithuania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Case presentation: We present a case report of a 23-year-old woman who was hospitalized in the Neurosurgery Department for biopsy of a brain mass. She had been diagnosed with Hodgkin's lymphoma at the age of 12, underwent surgery and chemotherapy, and had been in remission ever since. During her annual follow-up a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain was performed that revealed a lesion in the right temporal lobe. It was interpreted as central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma. Before arranged neurosurgical intervention, a follow-up MRI scan revealed multiple new small lesions in both hemispheres. Biopsy was not performed, and the patient was referred to the Neurology Department for clarification of the diagnosis. No abnormalities were detected in the tests performed. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was not tested due to the patient's refusal to repeat the unsuccessful procedure. The patient was discharged from the hospital. Three months later, she arrived at the Emergency Department abroad with impaired coordination and hypoesthesia on the right side of the body. Two MRI scans revealed a new lesion in the left posterior periventricular area. CNS lymphoma was suspected again. The patient received treatment with levetiracetam and dexamethasone. Upon her return, an MRI scan was repeated, which revealed an enlargement of the lesion. CSF testing showed indistinct oligoclonal bands. As CNS lymphoma could not be excluded, a lesion biopsy was performed after discontinuation of the steroids therapy. Histological examination excluded malignancy. Later, an MRI scan was repeated; it showed two new contrast-enhancing lesions. Relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) diagnosis was confirmed, and treatment with disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) was planned. Conclusions: Open-ring enhancement with little or no mass effect on MRI suggests a tumefactive demyelinating lesion (TDL). Moreover, TDLs tend to have a lower relative cerebral blood volume, and higher minimum and average apparent diffusion coefficient values compared to CNS lymphomas. Flow cytometry shows a monotypic B lymphoid population in cases of CNS lymphoma, not in MS.

Indexed as

CNS lymphomadifferential diagnosistumor-like multiple sclerosis

Identifiers

PMID42610000
PMCPMC13479659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.