Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42609996›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical education2026

Exploring the Interface of Hyperconjugation and PolarizabilityEnhancing Pedagogies for Charge Stabilization in Organic Chemistry.

Mark C Elliott, Kasimir P Gregory, Colan E Hughes, Benjamin D Ward

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mark C ElliottSchool of Chemistry, Cardiff University, Park Place, Cardiff CF10 3AT, U.K.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0132-0818
Kasimir P GregorySchool of Science and Technology, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8055-370X
Colan E HughesSchool of Chemistry, Cardiff University, Park Place, Cardiff CF10 3AT, U.K.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2374-2763
Benjamin D WardSchool of Chemistry, Cardiff University, Park Place, Cardiff CF10 3AT, U.K.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1406-5940

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The stabilization of positive and negative charges by alkyl groups (in particular) in organic compounds is often described as polarizability, but it can also be described as hyperconjugation (and related stereoelectronic effects). To a large extent, how one describes charge stabilization depends on the bonding model used. One can only talk about hyperconjugation in the context of a localized bonding model (hybridization). However, using this bonding model, it is less intuitive to talk about polarization of the whole molecule, which requires full molecular orbitals. It is important in chemical education to be aware of the limitations and intersections of the models we are using. In this work, we show that the polarization of alkyl chains in representative molecules, either by a computationally applied field or by a charge in the molecule, is reflected in changes in hyperconjugative interactions throughout the structure in a logical and predictable manner. This makes a clear and accessible point that hyperconjugation and polarizability are simply two models (at least for charge stabilization) that explain the same phenomenon. In this work, we identify advantages and limitations of each explanation, giving educators examples that can be used in teaching at various levels.

Indexed as

AlcoholsAlkanesAmmonium CompoundsCarbocationsComputational ChemistryCovalent BondingFirst-Year Undergraduate/GeneralMisconceptions/Discrepant EventsOrganic ChemistryPhysical Chemistry

Identifiers

PMID42609996
PMCPMC13480145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.