Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42609958›Full record

ArticleJournal of CME2026

Beyond Technical Updating: Why Civic Reasoning Matters in Continuing Medical Education.

Beti Indah Sari, Tri Mutmainnah, Vivi Kurnia Herviani

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of CME, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Beti Indah SariDepartment of Pancasila and Civic Education, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0259-0230
Tri MutmainnahFashion Design Education, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7674-2348
Vivi Kurnia HervianiDepartment of Special Education, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7158-7033

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This letter responds to Erlande's framing of civic education as community capacity building for primary care by arguing that its relevance also extends to continuing medical education (CME). In post-infodemic practice, clinicians need not only updated technical knowledge but also the ability to address misinformation, communicate uncertainty, and engage communities marked by uneven trust in expertise. The letter suggests that CME should more explicitly incorporate locally grounded public problems, communication training for contested digital environments, and reflective attention to accountability to marginalised communities. Civic reasoning, in this view, is part of contemporary professional competence rather than an optional addition to CME.

Indexed as

civic reasoningcommunity trustContinuing medical educationmarginalised communities

Identifiers

PMID42609958
PMCPMC13479513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.