ArticleOTO open
Antibiotic Use and Infection Patterns in Pediatric Tracheostomy Patients During Index Hospitalization.
Article in OTO open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate antibiotic utilization as a process measure in pediatric tracheostomy patients, establishing baseline variation across diagnostic categories to inform quality improvement and stewardship initiatives. Methods: We retrospectively studied pediatric tracheostomy patients at a tertiary children's hospital (2015-2024). Antibiotic use was quantified across diagnostic categories, with prophylactic courses defined as 2 days or less. Cultures were reviewed to distinguish true bacterial infections from viral detections and colonization. Mixed-effects logistic regression modeled infection risk, accounting for patient clustering. Sensitivity analyses excluded patients hospitalized over 365 days. Results: Of 429 patients (6.8 months [IQR 4.3-55.9]), respiratory conditions were most common (43.8%), followed by cardiac (19.3%). Cardiac patients had the highest antibiotic exposure (mean 52.1 days) despite low infection rates (17.8%), while trauma patients had the highest infection rates (31.5%). Diagnostic category did not significantly affect infection risk after accounting for clustering. Only 19.6% of 38,030 cultures showed true bacterial infection (median time 14.1 days posttracheostomy). Viral detection cascades triggered 11.4% of bacterial cultures within 48 hours. Discussion: Antibiotic prescribing patterns often reflect institutional preferences rather than true infection risk. Individual patient factors more strongly predict infection than diagnostic category. This highlights the need for personalized stewardship and standardized viral detection protocols. Implications for Practice: High variability in antibiotic utilization across diagnostic categories represents a measurable stewardship target. Reducing unnecessary exposure may decrease length of stay, healthcare costs, and antibiotic-associated complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.