ArticleJournal of food composition and analysis : an official publication of the United Nations University, International Network of Food Data Systems2026
Laboratory-Analyzed Nutrient Values Diverge from Database Estimates in Research-Specific Diets (Notably for Protein, Iron, Sodium).
Article in Journal of food composition and analysis : an official publication of the United Nations University, International Network of Food Data Systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nutrient databases are widely used to calculate the composition of research diets, yet their accuracy relative to laboratory measurements remain uncertain. We compared database-calculated values with laboratory-analyzed energy, protein, fat, and trace mineral concentrations in two controlled 5-day dietary patterns-the Dietary Guidelines for Americans Healthy Eating Pattern (DGA-HEP) and a typical American eating pattern (TAEP)-prepared in independent triplicate and analyzed as technical replicates, using a descriptive approach with a >10% relative-difference threshold. Energy and fat generally agreed between laboratory analyses and database estimates, whereas protein was consistently higher by laboratory analysis (DGA-HEP: +13 ± 2%; TAEP: +25 ± 5%). Trace minerals showed nutrient-specific discrepancies, with sodium systematically higher by laboratory analysis (~+14% to +40% across days) and iron systematically lower (~-15% to -58% across days) for both patterns; other minerals varied by nutrient and day. These results indicate that nutrient databases may over- or underestimate key nutrients depending on category, brand, formulation, and preparation. When precise composition is essential for study design or interpretation, targeted laboratory validation-particularly for protein, sodium, and iron-may be warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.