SynthesisFrontiers in public health2026
Loneliness among community-dwelling older adults across biological, clinical and psychosocial domains before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Loneliness is a subjective and distressing experience resulting from a discrepancy between desired and actual social relationships and represents an important public health concern among community-dwelling older adults. Although it can occur throughout the life course, older adults are particularly vulnerable because of age-related conditions such as multimorbidity, mobility limitations, sensory impairments, widowhood, and retirement. These factors highlight the need to understand loneliness as a multifactorial phenomenon requiring a multidimensional perspective considering biological, clinical, and psychosocial determinants and consequences. Objectives: This systematic literature review aims to investigate the extent to which the available literature on loneliness in older age adopts a multidisciplinary approach. Research design and methods: Multiple databases were searched and papers in biological, clinical and socio-psychological areas were selected according to predefined inclusion criteria and the PRISMA guidelines. Study characteristics (author, year of publication, methodology, and sample size) and contents (keywords, loneliness as primary or secondary outcome, multidisciplinary) were analysed. Results: One hundred thirty-one articles were selected: 22 biological; 51 clinical and 58 socio-psychological. Eighty-nine studies adopted quantitative methods, mostly concentrated in the biological area, while qualitative and mixed-method approaches are more common in the other two areas. In biological papers, loneliness is treated as an etiopathological factor or pathological condition, thus underestimating or denying its social significance. Clinical papers often associate loneliness with depression and socio-psychological ones do not investigate loneliness biological and clinical implications. Discussion and conclusion: Although the COVID-19 was associated with a growing number of multidisciplinary studies, research on loneliness among older adults remains largely fragmented across disciplinary boundaries. Strengthening collaboration across biological, clinical, and psychosocial domains could contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of loneliness and support the development of more effective prevention and intervention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.