ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Prospective validation protocol for artificial intelligence-assisted standardization of Coma Recovery Scale-Revised scores using electroencephalography and clinical data in disorders of consciousness.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Disorders of consciousness (DoC) after severe acquired brain injury are difficult to diagnose at the bedside. The Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) is the behavioral reference standard, but raw scores can be affected by arousal fluctuation, motor impairment, sensory deficits, sedation, language disturbance, and local assessment conditions. Objective: This protocol describes a prospective validation study of a multimodal artificial intelligence (AI) system designed to standardize CRS-R scores by integrating routine electroencephalography (EEG), bedside CRS-R subscale scores, and selected clinical contextual variables against an adjudicated standardized reference. Methods and analysis: The study includes retrospective model development followed by prospective, blinded clinical validation at Guangdong Second Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital. The locked model will use subscale-specific ordinal prediction modules and a rule-constrained integration layer to generate AI-standardized CRS-R subscale scores, total scores, diagnostic categories, uncertainty estimates, and prespecified case-level explanations. Prospective participants will undergo two independent bedside CRS-R assessments and routine scalp EEG within target and maximum assessment windows. A blinded expert committee will generate the reference CRS-R score using paired behavioral records, available videos, nursing observations, medication and confounder records. The primary endpoint is the participant-level reduction in absolute CRS-R total-score error after AI-assisted standardization relative to the adjudicated reference. Secondary endpoints include subscale agreement, diagnostic-category agreement, inter-rater variability, uncertainty-flag performance, workflow feasibility, and exploratory day-14 consciousness improvement. Ethics and dissemination: The protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Guangdong Second Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital (approval number Z202603-004-01; review date March 25, 2026; approval validity March 27, 2026 to March 26, 2027). Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication and academic presentations. Clinical Trial Registration: https://www.chictr.org.cn, Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2600124984.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.