ArticleERJ open research2026
Impact of lung cancer discovery mode on cancer outcomes: data from the KBP-2020-CPHG study.
Article in ERJ open research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Early-stage detection significantly improves prognosis, but most diagnoses are made at advanced stages due to limited early symptoms. This real-world study from the KBP-2020-CPHG cohort evaluated clinical characteristics and overall survival according to the mode of lung cancer discovery. Patients and methods: KBP-2020-CPHG is a nationwide prospective cohort of 8999 patients with newly diagnosed lung cancer in non-academic French hospitals. Patients were categorised by mode of lung cancer discovery as symptomatic presentation, incidental finding or individual screening. Baseline characteristics and survival were compared across groups. Results: Among 8943 patients with available data, 6404 (71.6%) were diagnosed symptomatically, 2178 (24.4%) incidentally and 361 (4.0%) through opportunistic screening in a non-organised context. Overall, 71.0%, 82.5% and 89.1% of patients, respectively, had performance status 0/1 (p<0.0001), and 3.4%, 6.4% and 6.9% had lepidic adenocarcinoma (p<0.001). Early-stage disease (stages 0-II) was diagnosed in 54.6% of screened patients, 40.5% of incidentally diagnosed patients and just 10.6% of symptomatically diagnosed patients (p<0.0001). Median overall survival was 45.6, 30.0 and 11.5 months, respectively. Corresponding 3-year overall survival rates were 59.0%, 46.3% and 26.4%. Conclusion: The mode of lung cancer discovery was associated with stage at diagnosis and survival. Compared with symptomatic diagnosis, screening and incidental detection were associated with earlier stage of diagnosis and significantly better overall survival. These findings support the broader implementation of structured early-detection strategies, including screening programs, to improve the prognosis of patients with lung cancer.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.