Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42609698›Full record

ArticleBMJ public health2026

Understanding language barriers at the registration desk of an after-hours clinic: a qualitative observational study.

Mohamed Irfan, Antoon Cox, Heidi Salaets, Marc Sabbe, Birgitte Schoenmakers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mohamed IrfanDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6032-5953
Antoon CoxResearch Group Interpreting Studies, KU Leuven Faculty of Arts, Antwerp, Belgium.
Heidi SalaetsResearch Group Interpreting Studies, KU Leuven Faculty of Arts, Antwerp, Belgium.
Marc SabbeEmergency Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Birgitte SchoenmakersDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Patients often seek after-hours medical care due to urgent concerns, convenience or limited access to their regular providers. In Belgium, such care is primarily delivered through general practitioner cooperatives (GPCs), where regional general practitioners collaborate and rotate shifts. Patients may present at GPCs either directly or after calling the national helpline (1733). While doctor-patient communication has been widely studied, interactions between patients and reception staff have received little attention. These initial encounters can strongly shape patients' comfort and perceptions of care. Methods: This ethnographic study used a dual-method approach to examine communication during initial interactions between patients and reception staff at an after-hours clinic. The methods included: (1) interactive observations of the registration process at the reception desk, supported by detailed field notes and (2) semistructured interviews with on-duty reception staff, focusing on their perceived ability to assist patients, particularly when facing language barriers or communication challenges. Results: Over a 4-week period, more than 60 hours of observational data were collected, offering valuable insights into patient flow, the languages spoken in the practice and the frequency of home visits. The observations also highlighted various strategies used to overcome communication challenges, such as involving accompanying persons, relying on non-verbal gestures and using technological aids. In addition, thematic analyses of the interviews conducted with five staff members revealed three key themes: professional experience, communication and self-reflection. Among these, communication emerged as a central concern, with language barrier cases consistently identified as a daily challenge in practice. Conclusion: This study highlights the critical yet often overlooked role of reception staff in ensuring equitable access to healthcare in linguistically diverse settings. The findings underscore the need to equip front-desk personnel with appropriate tools, training and institutional support to enable culturally and linguistically competent service delivery at the first point of contact.

Indexed as

CommunicationHealth PersonnelPublic HealthQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID42609698
PMCPMC13479486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.