Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42609632›Full record

ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)

Decision processes underlying effort avoidance and their relationship with metacognition.

Kazuki Yoshida, Ryuji Saito, Ryota Hayashi, Seiichi Watanabe, Hiroki Okada

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kazuki YoshidaFaculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1701-6274
Ryuji SaitoDepartment of Occupational Therapy, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Health Sciences University of Hokkaido, Ishikari, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1925-7044
Ryota HayashiDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7819-2487
Seiichi WatanabeMedical Corporation Nasukougen Hospital, Nasu-machi, Japan.
Hiroki OkadaDepartment of Occupational Therapy, School of Rehabilitation, Hyogo Medical University, Hyogo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effort-based decision making relies on cost-benefit computations that require individuals to evaluate expected rewards against the effort needed to obtain them. However, the temporal dynamics underlying the neural processing of reward and effort, as well as the influence of metacognitive ability on this process, remain unclear. The present study investigated these dynamics by recording electroencephalogram (EEG) data while participants performed an effort-based decision-making task and by assessing their metacognitive ability. Decoding analyses of the EEG data revealed that neural representations of effort-avoidance decisions emerged early (approximately 260 ms after stimulus onset) and remained stable over time. Crucially, representational similarity analysis showed that the brain processes reward information before effort information. Although both types of information were primarily represented in parietal electrodes, effort processing engaged a broader network that also included frontal regions. Behaviorally, higher metacognitive ability was associated with better task performance and reduced sensitivity to immediate rewards. These findings suggest a sequential decision-making process in which individuals first evaluate potential rewards and subsequently integrate information about the required effort when deciding whether to avoid effort. Furthermore, higher metacognitive ability appears to buffer against immediate reward impulses, thereby promoting long-term goal-directed behavior. Overall, this study provides direct neural evidence for the temporal dynamics of cost-benefit computation and highlights the critical role of metacognition in effort-based decision making.

Indexed as

effort avoidanceeffort-based decision makingelectroencephalography (EEG)metacognitionneural decodingrepresentational similarity analysis

Identifiers

PMID42609632
PMCPMC13479346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.