ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
Decision processes underlying effort avoidance and their relationship with metacognition.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Effort-based decision making relies on cost-benefit computations that require individuals to evaluate expected rewards against the effort needed to obtain them. However, the temporal dynamics underlying the neural processing of reward and effort, as well as the influence of metacognitive ability on this process, remain unclear. The present study investigated these dynamics by recording electroencephalogram (EEG) data while participants performed an effort-based decision-making task and by assessing their metacognitive ability. Decoding analyses of the EEG data revealed that neural representations of effort-avoidance decisions emerged early (approximately 260 ms after stimulus onset) and remained stable over time. Crucially, representational similarity analysis showed that the brain processes reward information before effort information. Although both types of information were primarily represented in parietal electrodes, effort processing engaged a broader network that also included frontal regions. Behaviorally, higher metacognitive ability was associated with better task performance and reduced sensitivity to immediate rewards. These findings suggest a sequential decision-making process in which individuals first evaluate potential rewards and subsequently integrate information about the required effort when deciding whether to avoid effort. Furthermore, higher metacognitive ability appears to buffer against immediate reward impulses, thereby promoting long-term goal-directed behavior. Overall, this study provides direct neural evidence for the temporal dynamics of cost-benefit computation and highlights the critical role of metacognition in effort-based decision making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.