ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026
Patient reflections on benefits, challenges, and improvement opportunities for a VA podiatry telehealth program: a qualitative study.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Within the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), the High-risk Eye and Limb Preservation Program (HELPP) delivers basic foot care using telemedicine and remote technology to prevent Veteran limb amputation. To enable basic foot care delivery in rural locations, HELPP hires intermediate care technicians (ICTs) to perform foot care under the tele-supervision of a podiatrist. This evaluation aimed to understand HELPP benefits, challenges, and improvement opportunities based on patients' experiences. Methods: As part of a program evaluation, patients who had received HELPP care were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews informed by the RE-AIM framework to assess patient-experienced benefits and challenges with HELPP and identify improvement opportunities. Rapid analysis was performed using summary templates and an analytic matrix. Results: Twenty-one interviews were completed. Benefits included staff quality, increased convenience and accessibility, and improved and maintained foot health. Challenges included ICT turnover and the resulting issues with variability in communication and care quality, the podiatrist not being in-person, and scheduling issues. Patients' improvement suggestions focused on connecting more Veterans to care and follow-up care. Discussion: Overall, the patients interviewed were satisfied with their HELPP care and identified several benefits; however, patients also spoke to challenges and improvement opportunities that should be considered for HELPP expansion and sustainability. Notably, patients often spoke of staff quality and effect of staff turnover, highlighting the importance and visibility of staffing in telemedicine care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.