ReviewThe Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia2026
Strategies for strengthening eye care in India: a consensus-based recommendations.
Review in The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
India is committed to the World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Agency for the Prevention of Blindness "2030 In Sight" recommendations to improve eye health and visual impairment. Public health experts in India were invited to discuss and recommend strategies to reduce blindness by 2030 and consolidate the gains related to quality eye care by 2047. The experts reviewed the World Report on Vision, WHO's 2030 In Sight strategy, and the status of eye care in India, drawing on published literature and policy documents. They proposed 10 interlinked strategic pillars: universal coverage, human resources, financial sustainability, equity, partnerships, health information systems, quality care, elderly and marginalised eyecare, technology adoption, and monitoring of key indices. Using the Likert scale the experts arrived at consensus on the following recommendations: task shifting, measuring quality eyecare indicators, integrating health services, leveraging technology, expanding cashless services, and improving referral eyecare system. The recommendations also include target-oriented spending, centralised management of available resources, and interministerial commitment. Funding: Hyderabad Eye Research Foundation, Hyderabad, India.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.