SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2026
"It helps me cope": a meta-ethnographic synthesis on lived experiences of spiritual bypassing.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spiritual bypassing, referred to as the use of spiritual beliefs or practices to avoid unresolved psychological distress, is well represented in the etic (researcher- or outsider-derived) literature but has not previously been examined through a qualitative synthesis centered on lived experiences. This meta-ethnography addresses that gap. Using Noblit and Hare's seven-phase approach alongside the eMERGe reporting guidance, five qualitative and mixed-methods studies conducted between 2014 and 2023 were synthesized, drawing on accounts from 55 participants across culturally and religiously diverse contexts. Participants from Muslim American, African American Pentecostal, predominantly Brazilian and Norwegian, African American addiction recovery, and Christian interpersonal recipient contexts were represented. The line-of-argument synthesis generated three third-order constructs: (1) The Emergence and Internal Dynamics of Spiritual Bypassing; (2) Social and Structural Mechanisms Sustaining Spiritual Bypassing; and (3) Resolution: From Defensive to Integrative Spirituality. The findings indicate that spiritual bypassing is more accurately understood not as a fixed psychological deficit located within the individual but as a contextually adaptive response to psychological pain, maintained by structural conditions and resolved through the differentiation from, rather than the abandonment of, spirituality. These results extend and, in several respects, challenge Pargament's (2011) framework of religious coping and have implications for clinical practice and counseling education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.