ArticleMedComm2026
Clinical Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer and Tumor Immune Microenvironment Analysis: A Prospective-Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in MedComm, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The impact of immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) on surgical outcomes and immune remodeling remains underexplored. To investigate the efficacy and tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) changes of camrelizumab plus NAC for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), we collected TNBC patients receiving neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NIC) or NAC from clinical trials and routine practice, and set a series of endpoints, including total pathological complete response (pCR), breast pCR and TIME characteristics. After propensity score matching, the NIC cohort showed significantly higher rates of total pCR, breast pCR, and axillary pCR, and a lower rate of axillary lymph node dissection than the NAC cohort (all
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.