Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42609503›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Childhood adversity and disordered eating: the mediator role of food reward drive.

Cinzia C Pocol, Andrei Ion, Andrei C Miu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cinzia C PocolCognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Sciences of Education, Babeș-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Andrei IonAssessment and Individual Differences - AID Lab, Department of Psychology and Cognitive Science, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania.
Andrei C MiuCognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Sciences of Education, Babeș-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Disordered eating is a subclinical constellation of symptoms-including uncontrolled eating, emotional eating, and cognitive restraint-that constitutes an important risk factor for eating disorders. We examined the associations between childhood maltreatment and disordered eating symptoms and whether food reward drive is a mediator in this relationship. Domain-general anticipatory pleasure was examined as an alternative mediator. Methods: Romanian adults ( Results: Emotional abuse and emotional neglect uniquely predicted higher food reward drive. This, in turn, predicted uncontrolled eating, emotional eating, and cognitive restraint, yielding significant indirect effects for both types of maltreatment. After covariate adjustment, only the indirect pathway from emotional neglect to disordered eating via food reward drive remained significant. The results were replicated in a sensitivity analysis excluding participants with potentially biased (minimized) maltreatment reports, in which emotional neglect was the only domain showing a significant indirect effect. Symptom-specific models indicated the strongest pathways for uncontrolled and emotional eating, with weaker effects for cognitive restraint. Domain-general anticipatory pleasure showed an additional, smaller indirect effect in the opposite direction for emotional neglect. Discussion: These findings highlight food-specific reward drive as a mechanism linking childhood emotional neglect to disordered eating in adults.

Indexed as

childhood maltreatmentdisordered eatingeating disordersrewardstress

Identifiers

PMID42609503
PMCPMC13478131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.