ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Motivational withdrawal in college English learning: a mixed-methods investigation of diminished motivational support and perceived effort ineffectiveness.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study investigates the latent motivational structure and qualitative manifestations of motivational withdrawal among some Chinese higher vocational college students learning College English within exam-oriented instructional contexts. Drawing on Self-Determination Theory (SDT) and Learned Helplessness Theory (LHT), the study investigates how diminished self-determined motivational support and perceived effort ineffectiveness are reflected in students' reported experiences and observable disengagement. Methods: It employed a multiple-phase mixed-methods design involving an exploratory sample of 200 students, a confirmatory sample of an additional 200 students, and 5 English teachers from three higher vocational colleges in Jilin, Shandong, and Guangdong in China. Data from a 10-item questionnaire were analyzed through exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), while qualitative data from open-ended questionnaires, a focus group interview, classroom observations, platform records, and teacher interviews were subjected to thematic analysis. Results: The findings suggested a contextually coherent two-factor pattern within the present vocational English-learning sample that was supported through both exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses conducted on separate samples. Qualitative evidence showed that these dimensions were manifested in low task meaning, weak ownership of learning, effort-nullifying beliefs, anticipated failure, and recurrent non-engagement in exam-review activities. Discussion: Rather than representing simple unwillingness, students' disengagement was therefore interpreted as a patterned form of motivational withdrawal characterized by weakened motivational support and limited confidence in the effectiveness of effort within exam-oriented vocational English-learning contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.