ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Indigenous knowledge systems and pandemic health resilience.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Origins of pandemics: Why ecological disruption is central to global health security and the imperative for proactive prevention.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Indigenous Knowledge Systems (IKS) have played important roles in community-based health responses across the Global South, yet they remain marginalized in formal health policy during global health crises. This study examined how IKS were mobilized to support respiratory and immune health during the COVID-19 pandemic across BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa) and Southern African Development Community (SADC) countries. Methods: A qualitative exploratory research design was employed across Zimbabwe, South Africa, and China involving 38 participants. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews (n = 22), digital questionnaires (n = 10), and WhatsApp voice narratives (n = 6). Purposive and criterion-based sampling ensured representation across age, gender, geography, and familiarity with IKS. Data were analysed using Braun and Clarke's six-phase thematic analysis with inter-rater reliability verification (Cohen's κ = 0.82). Member checking was conducted through community advisory boards, and ethical approval was obtained from institutional review boards in each participating country. Results: Participants reported using 27 distinct herbal remedies, primarily derived from locally available plants, including Discussion: The findings suggest that IKS can complement biomedical approaches in strengthening health system resilience during public health emergencies. Integrating IKS into pandemic preparedness and response requires policies that recognize epistemological diversity, protect intellectual property, promote equitable benefit-sharing, and strengthen community knowledge sovereignty within planetary health frameworks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.