Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42609422›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Indigenous knowledge systems and pandemic health resilience.

Wilfred Lunga, Charles Musarurwa, Mkhokheli Sithole, Olivia Kunguma, Mildred Ziweya, Caiphus Baloyi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wilfred LungaDepartment of Science, Technology & Design Education, Faculty of Education, Midlands State University, Gweru, Zimbabwe.
Charles MusarurwaHuman Sciences Research Council (HSRC), Developmental Capable Ethical State, Pretoria, South Africa.
Mkhokheli SitholeFaculty of Social Science, School of Humanities, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Olivia KungumaDepartment of Science, Technology & Design Education, Faculty of Education, Midlands State University, Gweru, Zimbabwe.
Mildred ZiweyaNorthwest University Africa Centre for Disaster Studies, the Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, Potchefstroom, South Africa.
Caiphus BaloyiDisaster Management Training and Education Centre for Africa, the Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Indigenous Knowledge Systems (IKS) have played important roles in community-based health responses across the Global South, yet they remain marginalized in formal health policy during global health crises. This study examined how IKS were mobilized to support respiratory and immune health during the COVID-19 pandemic across BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa) and Southern African Development Community (SADC) countries. Methods: A qualitative exploratory research design was employed across Zimbabwe, South Africa, and China involving 38 participants. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews (n = 22), digital questionnaires (n = 10), and WhatsApp voice narratives (n = 6). Purposive and criterion-based sampling ensured representation across age, gender, geography, and familiarity with IKS. Data were analysed using Braun and Clarke's six-phase thematic analysis with inter-rater reliability verification (Cohen's κ = 0.82). Member checking was conducted through community advisory boards, and ethical approval was obtained from institutional review boards in each participating country. Results: Participants reported using 27 distinct herbal remedies, primarily derived from locally available plants, including Discussion: The findings suggest that IKS can complement biomedical approaches in strengthening health system resilience during public health emergencies. Integrating IKS into pandemic preparedness and response requires policies that recognize epistemological diversity, protect intellectual property, promote equitable benefit-sharing, and strengthen community knowledge sovereignty within planetary health frameworks.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePandemicsAdultBrazilChinaFemaleHumansIndiaMalePandemic PreparednessQualitative ResearchRussiaSARS-CoV-2South AfricaZimbabweBRICSCOVID-19immune healthindigenous knowledge systemspandemic preparednessperceived effectivenessplanetary healthrespiratory health

Identifiers

PMID42609422
PMCPMC13478246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.