Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42609400›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2026

Synergy-based feedforward with minimal feedback control predicts walking over multiple cycles.

Spencer T Williams, Geng Li, Benjamin J Fregly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Spencer T WilliamsRice Computational Neuromechanics Lab, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Rice University, Houston, TX, United States.
Geng LiRice Computational Neuromechanics Lab, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Rice University, Houston, TX, United States.
Benjamin J FreglyRice Computational Neuromechanics Lab, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Rice University, Houston, TX, United States.

Funding

OpenSim Enhancements to Enable Computational Design of Personalized Treatments for Movement ImpairmentsR01EB030520 · NIBIB · RICE UNIVERSITY · PI FREGLY, BENJAMIN J, PATTEN, CAROLYNN · 2021 to 2024
$2.4M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB030520
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neural feedback is important for the control of movement, and multiple neurological disorders (e.g., stroke, cerebral palsy, Parkinson's disease, incomplete spinal cord injury) are characterized by altered neural feedback. Researchers have created numerous computational neuromusculoskeletal models controlled by simulated neural feedback mechanisms, but these models rarely represent actual human subjects and thus have not found practical clinical application. As a step toward designing patient-specific treatments for individuals with neurological disorders, this study used the Neuromusculoskeletal Modeling Pipeline to develop and evaluate a novel synergy-based feedforward (FF)+feedback (FB) control model using a personalized three-dimensional neuromusculoskeletal walking model of an actual human subject post-stroke. Experimental walking data collected from the subject were used to create the subject's personalized walking model. Then for five calibration walking cycles, personalized synergy-based FF + FB control models were created. First, the personalized model was used to estimate lower body muscle activations, consistent with the subject's electromyographic, joint motion, and joint moment data. Second, five synergy activations per leg with associated synergy vectors were calculated that closely reconstructed the subject's muscle activations and joint moments simultaneously. Third, nominal FF synergy activation controls were calculated by averaging the synergy activations for each leg. Fourth, the nominal FF synergy controls were scaled by 0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, 100%, and 125%, and the gap in reproducing the subject's muscle activations was filled by fitting FB synergy activation controls as a function of joint positions, velocities, and moments as surrogates for muscle lengths, muscle velocities, and tendon forces. Next for three testing walking cycles, six synergy-based FF + FB models were used to control the subject's personalized walking model in predictive simulations. The 100% FF model (which still had minimal FB) reproduced the testing walking cycles the most closely, and only the 75%, 100%, and 125% FF models predicted near-periodic walking motions using initial conditions consistent with experimental values. The 0%, 25%, and 50% FF models could generate near-periodic walking motions only when the initial conditions were allowed to diverge substantially from experimental values. Our findings suggest that predictive simulations of walking may require substantial feedforward control when modeling an actual human subject.

Indexed as

EMG-driven modelingmodel personalizationmuscle synergiesneural feedbackneuromusculoskeletal modelingpredictive simulationstroketreatment optimization

Identifiers

PMID42609400
PMCPMC13478117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.